<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies in Analyzers</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767462#M171</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I also tried the Lightweight hotspot analysis here I do get all my method names, though as these are not related according call stacks, just a flat list of methods, I cannot see what is actually happening, so it will only provide methods that are, maybe expensive, though their usage wil remain a mystery.&lt;BR /&gt;Without call stack/context I do nog have enough inputs to easily find bottlenecks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Van_Wijk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T16:20:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767459#M168</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using VTune Amplifier XE 2011 update 3. I tried profiling various applications and unfortunately for all assemblies compiled as AnyCPU i'm not seeing methodnames in the stacks/profiling output. I created some other exe, and indeed if compiled as any cpu profiling did not yield method names, &lt;BR /&gt;compiled as explicitly x86 or x64 did generate the nice method names.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a known solution or workaround for this issue? As generally recompiling all these assemblies (many third party) will not be a solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Mark</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767459#M168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Van_Wijk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-04T12:01:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767460#M169</link>
      <description>Please try the latest update (Update 7) as there were many improvments in our .NET support between Update 3 and Update 7. Also, please let us know if that resolves your problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:50:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767460#M169</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_A_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-04T18:50:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767461#M170</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have retried with update 7, for a simple standalone executable it is now working OK, however, the code I actually want to profile uses a more complex setup and there I still get the&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;[Dynamic code]![0@] - [Unknown]&lt;BR /&gt;[Dynamic code]![0@]+0x36d281 - [Unknown]&lt;BR /&gt;[Dynamic code]![0@]+0x33828d - [Unknown]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Multiple assemblies are there loaded using for example loadfrom, the code intercepts assembly not found events and then probes itself for the assemblies in various well known directories.&lt;BR /&gt;This allows independent directories for multiple versions of the software and both xcopy deployment as easy swapping of versions of used libraries.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All are compiled reease though with pdb generated (same as the earlier mentioned standalone program)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So at this point I can stil not use Amplifier XE for my production code.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Mark</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767461#M170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Van_Wijk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T12:00:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767462#M171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also tried the Lightweight hotspot analysis here I do get all my method names, though as these are not related according call stacks, just a flat list of methods, I cannot see what is actually happening, so it will only provide methods that are, maybe expensive, though their usage wil remain a mystery.&lt;BR /&gt;Without call stack/context I do nog have enough inputs to easily find bottlenecks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767462#M171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Van_Wijk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-03T16:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Missing method names with any cpu compiled .NET assemblies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767463#M172</link>
      <description>Hi Mark:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The developer has reproduced the problem and is investigating a fix. For some reason, when the C# DLL is dynamically loaded using the reflection API, VTune Amplifier XE doesn't get the name of the DLL and so inserts a null name, causing it to be included in the [Dynamic Code] pseudo-module.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'll update this thread when a fix is available.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-method-names-with-any-cpu-compiled-NET-assemblies/m-p/767463#M172</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_A_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-07T23:13:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

