<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel MPI underperforming in Analyzers</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Intel-MPI-underperforming/m-p/1146081#M17257</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Intel MPI ( version 2019.3.199) is underperforming in our InfiniBand FDR cluster. Bandwidth is a little more than half it should be with a benchmark MPI code. The Pingpong IMB also shows a significant decrease compared with mvapich, for example. This is noticed also in application codes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 22:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>alberto__pedro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-14T22:16:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel MPI underperforming</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Intel-MPI-underperforming/m-p/1146081#M17257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Intel MPI ( version 2019.3.199) is underperforming in our InfiniBand FDR cluster. Bandwidth is a little more than half it should be with a benchmark MPI code. The Pingpong IMB also shows a significant decrease compared with mvapich, for example. This is noticed also in application codes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 22:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Intel-MPI-underperforming/m-p/1146081#M17257</guid>
      <dc:creator>alberto__pedro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T22:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

