<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Statistical call graph visualization in Analyzers</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820466#M2222</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;1. The user can export VTune resultin gprof format:amplxe-cl -report gprof-cc -r r000?hs&lt;BR /&gt;2. The user can use amplxe-gui to open result and view in Top-down Treepanel, which has a tree view with all function nodes (with total CPU time and self CPU time).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards, Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peter_W_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-18T03:05:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Statistical call graph visualization</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820465#M2221</link>
      <description>I am evaluatign the product for a Linux application, I am not exactly trying to improve performance, but to study the current application we have.&lt;BR /&gt;Reading the forum I know the call graphs are no longer exact which is fine because I have plenty of other tools for that. I think the wall-clock time is a better tool for identifying the hot spots any ways. &lt;BR /&gt;However, that would be nice if I could get a nice traditional diagram of the statistical call graph, then I could print it on a large paper and study the paths taken.&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, I can use gprof2dot application with callgrind, gprof, perf, oprofile, ... with really nice results, if there is any documentation on the saved format that could help in creating a plugin for VTune as well.&lt;BR /&gt;One more thing, the comparision assumes both profiles run exactly for the same duration, is there anyway to normalize the results by total time consumed?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 16:22:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820465#M2221</guid>
      <dc:creator>dashesy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-17T16:22:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Statistical call graph visualization</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820466#M2222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. The user can export VTune resultin gprof format:amplxe-cl -report gprof-cc -r r000?hs&lt;BR /&gt;2. The user can use amplxe-gui to open result and view in Top-down Treepanel, which has a tree view with all function nodes (with total CPU time and self CPU time).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards, Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820466#M2222</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_W_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-18T03:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's possible to use</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820467#M2223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's possible to use&amp;nbsp;gprof2dot with VTune results - read &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/node/385020"&gt;this blog post&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 07:15:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Statistical-call-graph-visualization/m-p/820467#M2223</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirill_R_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-05T07:15:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

