<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Extracting call sequence info with VTune in Analyzers</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856341#M3205</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>luweichao-2004</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-17T02:03:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Extracting call sequence info with VTune</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856340#M3204</link>
      <description>Hi there,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any way of extracting the call sequence info of an application with VTune or even PTU?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I mean if I code something like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;main(){&lt;BR /&gt;f1();&lt;BR /&gt;f2();&lt;BR /&gt;}&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;versus&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;main(){&lt;BR /&gt;f2();&lt;BR /&gt;f1();&lt;BR /&gt;}&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;how can I get a call graph or something that can tell the difference. Is this even possible with VTune or PTU?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Emad&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856340#M3204</guid>
      <dc:creator>emadshihab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-15T03:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extracting call sequence info with VTune</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856341#M3205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 02:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856341#M3205</guid>
      <dc:creator>luweichao-2004</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-17T02:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extracting call sequence info with VTune</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856342#M3206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just came across your post. It may be too late but I will still vebture to answer:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;in PTU you have the statistical callgraph - sampling the call stack at specified intervals - intrusion level very low&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or the callgraph in vTune which will give the exact picture but the intrusion level is way higher as for the PTU statistical callgraph.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856342#M3206</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicolae_P_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-02T13:21:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extracting call sequence info with VTune</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856343#M3207</link>
      <description>The short answer is, no. Both tools build a "call tree" and do not maintain order of calls. You can "drill down" to the source code and view the order there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Extracting-call-sequence-info-with-VTune/m-p/856343#M3207</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_A_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-16T17:14:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

