<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Missing functions in drill down in Analyzers</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-functions-in-drill-down/m-p/865761#M3571</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using VTune 9.1 with the remote collectors. After my runs are over I try and drill down through the process I'm interested in trying to look at counts for particular functions. This one function I tried to get to calculates 2 values and then calls a series of library calls. The library functions are in the list of functions called with their associated counts, but the specific function I was looking for is not listed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is like this function was "optimized" out, even though with the calculations there would cause floating point counts to be reflected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;Les&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lhartzman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-01T22:33:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missing functions in drill down</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-functions-in-drill-down/m-p/865761#M3571</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using VTune 9.1 with the remote collectors. After my runs are over I try and drill down through the process I'm interested in trying to look at counts for particular functions. This one function I tried to get to calculates 2 values and then calls a series of library calls. The library functions are in the list of functions called with their associated counts, but the specific function I was looking for is not listed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is like this function was "optimized" out, even though with the calculations there would cause floating point counts to be reflected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;Les&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-functions-in-drill-down/m-p/865761#M3571</guid>
      <dc:creator>lhartzman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T22:33:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing functions in drill down</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-functions-in-drill-down/m-p/865762#M3572</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
It's often necessary to make a static link in order to get library events included in a convenient way with your module of interest. Even then, if the library were stripped, the function might not show up with proper identification.&lt;BR /&gt;Even if everything is set up OK, if your run doesn't take enough samples, it's possible to miss something. My usual experience with even a run of a few minutes is that functions with less than 1% of the events don't show up reliably. Sometimes, it's possible to make an artificial case which spends enough time in the function of interest to get useful data.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Analyzers/Missing-functions-in-drill-down/m-p/865762#M3572</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T23:20:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

