https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/call-numpy-random-directly-not-numpy-random-intel/m-p/1171501#M1263 <P>As it said in title, since Intel optimizes numpy.random and it will make accelebrate a lots. However, I should use numpy.random_intel when I want to use it. Similarly numpy.fft, if use numpy.fft directly it will be nice. But numpy.random isn't that.</P> <P>I have try some ways, but it fails. See <A href="https://github.com/IntelPython/mkl_random/issues/2">https://github.com/IntelPython/mkl_random/issues/2 </A>more information.</P> <P>Really thanks!</P> Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:02:49 GMT yan_c_ 2017-12-12T02:02:49Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/call-numpy-random-directly-not-numpy-random-intel/m-p/1171501#M1263 <P>As it said in title, since Intel optimizes numpy.random and it will make accelebrate a lots. However, I should use numpy.random_intel when I want to use it. Similarly numpy.fft, if use numpy.fft directly it will be nice. But numpy.random isn't that.</P> <P>I have try some ways, but it fails. See <A href="https://github.com/IntelPython/mkl_random/issues/2">https://github.com/IntelPython/mkl_random/issues/2 </A>more information.</P> <P>Really thanks!</P> Tue, 12 Dec 2017 02:02:49 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/call-numpy-random-directly-not-numpy-random-intel/m-p/1171501#M1263 yan_c_ 2017-12-12T02:02:49Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/call-numpy-random-directly-not-numpy-random-intel/m-p/1171502#M1264 <P>Hi Yan</P> <P>Thank you for the question. I have posted a response on the referenced issue for mkl_random.</P> <P>For the benefits of other readers of the forum, I would like to link&nbsp; &nbsp;https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-distribution-for-python/topic/747598</P> Wed, 13 Dec 2017 14:55:34 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/call-numpy-random-directly-not-numpy-random-intel/m-p/1171502#M1264 Oleksandr_P_Intel 2017-12-13T14:55:34Z