<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Jamie, in Intel® Distribution for Python*</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083848#M300</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jamie,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In earlier releases of Intel Python, I had a similar issue when running some tests on macOS. However, it happened on early beta versions. Are you sure you are working with the latest version?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gaston-hillar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-16T22:12:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Slower than expected</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083846#M298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;I installed the Intel/Python 2.7 on Mac OS X 10.10.5 and ran a script with a lot of linear algebra (svds) and was surprised to find that it ran half as fast as the Anaconda version on the same machine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;That's unexpected. Is something obviously wrong?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083846#M298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jamie_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-31T21:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Jamie,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083847#M299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jamie,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you for reporting this! Answering your question, no this is not expected and surprises me too. Essentially both Anaconda* and Intel Distribution for Python take benefit from the Intel MKL. In theory the performance should be the same.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Can you provide extra details about versions of Anaconda* and Intel Python that you used?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Would it be possible to provide the test case so we can reproduce exactly what you get?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Also what hardware do you run on?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Sergey&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083847#M299</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey_M_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-01T16:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Jamie,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083848#M300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jamie,&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;In earlier releases of Intel Python, I had a similar issue when running some tests on macOS. However, it happened on early beta versions. Are you sure you are working with the latest version?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/Slower-than-expected/m-p/1083848#M300</guid>
      <dc:creator>gaston-hillar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-16T22:12:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

