<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hi Orion, in Intel® Distribution for Python*</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127023#M806</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Orion,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sparse algebra operations &amp;amp; solvers optimization is still our future work. We do not yet have a specific timeline for that. With that said providing scikit-umfpack with Intel Distribution for Python does bring little to no value compared to what's already available on PyPI or Anaconda. If you pip-install or conda-install the default package it should work fine with Intel Python. Do you experience any problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sergey Maidanov&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2019 07:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sergey_M_Intel2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-06T07:12:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>scikit-umfpack</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127022#M805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any chance scikit-umfpack could be provided?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 19:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127022#M805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orion_P_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-04T19:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Orion,</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127023#M806</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Orion,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sparse algebra operations &amp;amp; solvers optimization is still our future work. We do not yet have a specific timeline for that. With that said providing scikit-umfpack with Intel Distribution for Python does bring little to no value compared to what's already available on PyPI or Anaconda. If you pip-install or conda-install the default package it should work fine with Intel Python. Do you experience any problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sergey Maidanov&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2019 07:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127023#M806</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey_M_Intel2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-06T07:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I've taken to installing</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127024#M807</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've taken to installing scikit-umfpack from conda-forge.&amp;nbsp; I had tried to avoid conda-forge in the past, but I've come to resign myself to using it now.&amp;nbsp; No issues yet so I should be all set.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Distribution-for-Python/scikit-umfpack/m-p/1127024#M807</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orion_P_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T19:33:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

