<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MITI study says 40&amp;#92;% of quality problems in embedded systems are software   errors in Embedded Intel® Core™ Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/MITI-study-says-40-92-of-quality-problems-in-embedded-systems/m-p/228097#M1673</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The topic is quite curious, i must say&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-04T13:09:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MITI study says 40\% of quality problems in embedded systems are software   errors</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/MITI-study-says-40-92-of-quality-problems-in-embedded-systems/m-p/228096#M1672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read this blog regarding the MITI study and wondered, how many of you agree with that number? (40\%)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a clip from the blog from Yuriy Zaytsev:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"&lt;I&gt;Over 40\% of the quality problems with embedded products after shipment are caused by software errors.&lt;/I&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+The&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;leading cause of the quality problems with embedded products after&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;shipment was software errors (46.3\%), followed by hardware design&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;faults (21.8\%) and production faults (12.7\%). A trend over the past&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;four years is that the percentage of faults during product&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conceptualization and specification continues to fall year after year.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Software errors have remained the major cause of quality problems for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the past four years.+ "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read more here: &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/asehmi/archive/2008/10/07/architecture-journal-17-article-on-distributed-embedded-systems.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/asehmi/archive/2008/10/07/architecture-journal-17-article-on-distributed-embedded-systems.aspx&lt;/A&gt; &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/asehmi/archive/2008/10/07/architecture-journal-17-article-on-distributed-embedded-systems.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/asehmi/archive/2008/10/07/architecture-journal-17-article-on-distributed-embedded-systems.aspx&lt;/A&gt;" &amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/MITI-study-says-40-92-of-quality-problems-in-embedded-systems/m-p/228096#M1672</guid>
      <dc:creator>DSeif</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-11T00:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MITI study says 40\% of quality problems in embedded systems are software   errors</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/MITI-study-says-40-92-of-quality-problems-in-embedded-systems/m-p/228097#M1673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The topic is quite curious, i must say&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/MITI-study-says-40-92-of-quality-problems-in-embedded-systems/m-p/228097#M1673</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-04T13:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

