<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pktgen-dpdk in Embedded Intel® Core™ Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194714#M333</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That shows the performance you are observing is - it is not CPU bound.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since it was I/o bound, the more you added, it scaled with I/o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And with 128 byte packet size you should get what you are looking for.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:51:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Muthurajan_J_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-27T04:51:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194705#M324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a questions about pktgen-dpdk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;why the Total Tx is not equal to Rx, and had no errors at the same time?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The relevant environment is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS type: CentOS 6.6 x64&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pktgen-dpdk version: 2.8.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DPDK version: 2.0.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NIC: 82599ES&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194705#M324</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-11T07:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194706#M325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Leo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Welcome back to the Intel Embedded Community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have notice that you are using these addresses: 192.168.0.1/24 and 192.168.1.1/24, according to these IPs you are using different subnets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any device in between? any router? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Please send a network diagram.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabriel Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194706#M325</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gabriel_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-11T20:15:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194707#M326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Gabriel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isn't it just a default settings ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just run the command:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;./app/pktgen -c 0x1f -n 3 -- -P -m "2.0, 3.1" -l pktgen.log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My diagram is like below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 02:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194707#M326</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-12T02:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194708#M327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Leo_Yeh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have consulted this with our DPDK engineers and as soon as we have more information we'll get back with you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jimmy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2015 00:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194708#M327</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-15T00:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194709#M328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello  Leo_Yeh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Supported Operating Systems for the Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) are the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Fedora release 18 Red Hat* Enterprise Linux 6.3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Wind River* Linux* 5 Ubuntu* 12.04 LTS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 SP2 FreeBSD 9.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer to &lt;A href="http://www.dpdk.org/doc/nics"&gt;http://www.dpdk.org/doc/nics&lt;/A&gt; Supported NICs and the following &lt;A href="http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/index.html"&gt;http://www.dpdk.org/doc/guides/index.html&lt;/A&gt; DPDK documentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Josue.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 23:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194709#M328</guid>
      <dc:creator>Josue_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-17T23:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194710#M329</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Josue,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194710#M329</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-19T01:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194711#M330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;why does the performance seems not good?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I mean, port 0/1 are fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, port 2/3 and 4/5, their performance seems bad, maybe 50~60 % only. (MBits/s Rx/Tx)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 'page cpu' is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I tune the performance ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, my OS is ubuntu 14.04&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NIC is 82599.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194711#M330</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-24T10:03:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194712#M331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Leo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are working in your case, we will contact you with additional information soon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gabriel Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194712#M331</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gabriel_T_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-25T18:21:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194713#M332</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update the status.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I changed my number of NICs to 12 ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I found the performance like below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks pretty good !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it that achieve the line rate ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible 'total rate' to achieve 60000/60000 or 59999/59999 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Leo,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194713#M332</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-26T08:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pktgen-dpdk</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194714#M333</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That shows the performance you are observing is - it is not CPU bound.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since it was I/o bound, the more you added, it scaled with I/o.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And with 128 byte packet size you should get what you are looking for.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:51:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Embedded-Intel-Core-Processors/pktgen-dpdk/m-p/194714#M333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Muthurajan_J_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-27T04:51:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

