<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Use world space? in Intel® Embree Ray Tracing Kernels</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920334#M166</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it make a sense to build embree accel structs in world space and convert rays/poinrs from camera to world before cast rays? Many scenes are built as "more aligned" in world space. so at least in theory a better data ballance/division can be&amp;nbsp; achieved. Did anyone try and what is an effect?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>theigors</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T12:33:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Use world space?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920334#M166</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it make a sense to build embree accel structs in world space and convert rays/poinrs from camera to world before cast rays? Many scenes are built as "more aligned" in world space. so at least in theory a better data ballance/division can be&amp;nbsp; achieved. Did anyone try and what is an effect?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920334#M166</guid>
      <dc:creator>theigors</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T12:33:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In ray tracing you by default</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920335#M167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In ray tracing you by default build your acceleration structure in world space, to take advantage of aligned geometry as you point out. This further has the advantage that one can move the camera without having to rebuild the acceleration structure. To get best performance pass world space geometry to Embree.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920335#M167</guid>
      <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-14T05:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My tests don't show</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920336#M168</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My tests don't show significant speedup for room scene (attach)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- 3:33 world space&lt;BR /&gt;- 3:38 camera space&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920336#M168</guid>
      <dc:creator>theigors</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-20T12:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Your camera view is almost</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920337#M169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your camera view is almost axis aligned, thus it is not surprising that you do not see a big difference. If you rotate the camera by 45° you should see a performance degragation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Use-world-space/m-p/920337#M169</guid>
      <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-21T05:15:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

