<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic That makes sense. I'll look in Intel® Embree Ray Tracing Kernels</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011881#M352</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That makes sense. I'll look into using that instead. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:02:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pshr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-30T07:02:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Closest to location</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011877#M348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"&gt;For our purposes of using Embree as a ray-tracer in our geometry-accelerated Monte Carlo code, it is sometimes necessary to find the closest intersection to a given location. Would you have a recommendation on how best to do this using Embree?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 15:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011877#M348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick_S_4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-21T15:52:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Embree does not include a</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011878#M349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Embree does not include a kernel that could directly find the closest geometry location to a given point. You could approximate this by sampling some directions using ray tracing, but this would be slow and might be not accurate enough.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The best would probably be that you implement this procedure yourself. You could re-use the Embree hierarchies (see bvh_access tutorial in devel branch) or build a new hierarchy using the Embree builders (see bvh_build tutorial).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 05:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011878#M349</guid>
      <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-22T05:05:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reviving this rather old</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011879#M350</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Reviving this rather old thread...I'm afraid I don't see a clean way to access Embree's BVH the same way that the tutorial does. It seems to access a lot of headers in the Embree source directly. Are there guidelines on how to follow the same build process in an external application?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 06:45:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011879#M350</guid>
      <dc:creator>pshr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-30T06:45:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No there is no other way and</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011880#M351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No there is no other way and we also recommend best not to access the internal BVH. It is by definition an opaque data structure for the application. If you need a BVH for your app, best use the BVH build API of Embree to build a BVH in some application defined layout.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 06:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011880#M351</guid>
      <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-30T06:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>That makes sense. I'll look</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011881#M352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That makes sense. I'll look into using that instead. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:02:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/Closest-to-location/m-p/1011881#M352</guid>
      <dc:creator>pshr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-30T07:02:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

