<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic As I think about it I cannot in Intel® Embree Ray Tracing Kernels</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/rtcDetachGeometry-using-RTCGeometry/m-p/1156811#M734</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As I think about it I cannot give you a good reason why it is that way. We will add a second call where you can also provide the RTCGeometry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-22T06:05:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rtcDetachGeometry using RTCGeometry</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/rtcDetachGeometry-using-RTCGeometry/m-p/1156810#M733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason that rtcDetachGeometry that accepts a&amp;nbsp;geomID int instead of&amp;nbsp;an&amp;nbsp;RTCGeometry pointer?&amp;nbsp;It seems to break the pattern set by&amp;nbsp;rtcAttachGeometry/rtcAttachGeometryByID but maybe I'm misunderstanding the API. I'm working with a dynamic scene and I'm&amp;nbsp;retaining the&amp;nbsp;RTCGeometry but not the&amp;nbsp;geomID, per docs:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best store the geometry handle inside your scene representation (and release it in the destructor) and access the handle directly instead of calling&amp;nbsp;rtcGetGeometry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It wouldn't be a big deal to retain the&amp;nbsp;geomID as well if necessary, this question is more out of curiosity. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/rtcDetachGeometry-using-RTCGeometry/m-p/1156810#M733</guid>
      <dc:creator>Burr__Adam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-21T16:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As I think about it I cannot</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/rtcDetachGeometry-using-RTCGeometry/m-p/1156811#M734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I think about it I cannot give you a good reason why it is that way. We will add a second call where you can also provide the RTCGeometry.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Embree-Ray-Tracing-Kernels/rtcDetachGeometry-using-RTCGeometry/m-p/1156811#M734</guid>
      <dc:creator>SvenW_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-22T06:05:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

