<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic D435: Shooting in portrait orientation in Items with no label</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/D435-Shooting-in-portrait-orientation/m-p/614069#M13101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I did something a little stupid, and I'd appreciate public confirmation of my bad idea. To shoot in portrait orientation when using the Brown Conrady distortion model, it's not possible to simply swap: width/height, fx/fy, and ppx/ppy, (ignoring the distortion coefficients here for simplicity)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did this and then deprojected my point cloud and see a considerably misaligned color to depth. This is expected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My distortion model is (4) or (RS2_DISTORTION_BROWN_CONRADY).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-18T18:36:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>D435: Shooting in portrait orientation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/D435-Shooting-in-portrait-orientation/m-p/614069#M13101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I did something a little stupid, and I'd appreciate public confirmation of my bad idea. To shoot in portrait orientation when using the Brown Conrady distortion model, it's not possible to simply swap: width/height, fx/fy, and ppx/ppy, (ignoring the distortion coefficients here for simplicity)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did this and then deprojected my point cloud and see a considerably misaligned color to depth. This is expected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My distortion model is (4) or (RS2_DISTORTION_BROWN_CONRADY).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/D435-Shooting-in-portrait-orientation/m-p/614069#M13101</guid>
      <dc:creator>idata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T18:36:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: D435: Shooting in portrait orientation</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/D435-Shooting-in-portrait-orientation/m-p/614070#M13102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the old RealSense camera models, I just turned the camera round (e.g on the side or pointing down) to get a different orientation.  It did not work for every feature though - you could track hand joints but not face landmarks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There have been instances when an R200 camera has been pointed downwards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 19:21:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/D435-Shooting-in-portrait-orientation/m-p/614070#M13102</guid>
      <dc:creator>MartyG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T19:21:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

