<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re-calibration of D435 often needed in Items with no label</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/Re-calibration-of-D435-often-needed/m-p/699199#M16508</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are calibrating the D435 cameras, with your tools, and that works very well. After a calibration the depth error is really low and the depth image works well with no artifacts etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER, we quite often need to re-calibrate!! Suddenly we see that the depth data contains a lot of artifacts (ghost objects that are much too close than what they really are). A re-calibration fixes the issue and everything is fine for a while. The D435 is mounted on a DJI drone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any info on what can cause this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Can it be that the vibrations from the electric motors/props slowly destroys the calibration? Or something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) What is it that happens within the D435 when a re-calib is needed? Are there mechanical/physical "things" that move within the cam? Or ... ? Can we maybe fasten some parts of the cam better?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mats B&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MBerg22</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-15T17:00:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re-calibration of D435 often needed</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/Re-calibration-of-D435-often-needed/m-p/699199#M16508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are calibrating the D435 cameras, with your tools, and that works very well. After a calibration the depth error is really low and the depth image works well with no artifacts etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HOWEVER, we quite often need to re-calibrate!! Suddenly we see that the depth data contains a lot of artifacts (ghost objects that are much too close than what they really are). A re-calibration fixes the issue and everything is fine for a while. The D435 is mounted on a DJI drone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have any info on what can cause this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Can it be that the vibrations from the electric motors/props slowly destroys the calibration? Or something else?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) What is it that happens within the D435 when a re-calib is needed? Are there mechanical/physical "things" that move within the cam? Or ... ? Can we maybe fasten some parts of the cam better?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mats B&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/Re-calibration-of-D435-often-needed/m-p/699199#M16508</guid>
      <dc:creator>MBerg22</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T17:00:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re-calibration of D435 often needed</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/Re-calibration-of-D435-often-needed/m-p/699200#M16509</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The stereo algorithms on the 400 Series cameras are very robust again vibration up to a certain point, where they may start to become an issue if the vibration is severe enough. There was a recent case on the RealSense GitHub site where a user who is using the camera with agricultural machinery was having their camera signal drop because of excessive vibration, even when using a USB cable with a screw-lock to firmly fix the cable in the camera's USB port so it could not work its way loose during motion. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggested using some form of "vibration suppression" pad like those that can be placed on the feet of a tripod to dampen vibrations so less of it is passed through the camera mount to the camera. Google for 'vibration suppression pad' to see the products available, please.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do also recall though that there was a previous case of artifacts on a drone equipped with a D435. The user provided a short video of the flight and the artifacts during it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.intel.com/s/question/0D50P0000490XM0SAM/noise-in-realsense-d435-pointcloud?language=en_US" target="_self" alt="https://forums.intel.com/s/question/0D50P0000490XM0SAM/noise-in-realsense-d435-pointcloud?language=en_US"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.intel.com/s/question/0D50P0000490XM0SAM/noise-in-realsense-d435-pointcloud?language=en_US"&gt;https://forums.intel.com/s/question/0D50P0000490XM0SAM/noise-in-realsense-d435-pointcloud?language=en_US&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The camera should not usually need re-calibrating unless it has received physical shocks such as a hard knock or a drop on the ground. I guess severe physical vibration could fall into the 'physical shock' category!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The standard D435 inside is essentially the Vision Processor D4 board (which does processing on the captured data), the D430 Depth Camera Module with a pair (left and right) of IR imagers on it, and a separately-attached RGB sensor connected via a cable. Unlike the D435i model, it does not have an IMU unit with gyro and accelerometer.  It is the imager sensor parts of the camera that the Dynamic Calibration process adjusts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 17:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Items-with-no-label/Re-calibration-of-D435-often-needed/m-p/699200#M16509</guid>
      <dc:creator>MartyG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T17:45:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

