<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Yes, we did bring that back. in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015127#M106906</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we did bring that back.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 18:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-14T18:41:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Review Comment</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015124#M106903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Steve:&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Why at times do I get a "this comment has been sent to the moderator for review?" Or some such comment.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Are there trip words like - Intel, Fortran, Steve etc that trigger a review need?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;JMN&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 14:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015124#M106903</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnNichols</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T14:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Because we've had a bad</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015125#M106904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Because we've had a bad problem with spammers in the past, all posts are run through a spam filter that uses a commercial service to decide how "spammy" a post looks. If the filter doesn't like the post, it puts it in a queue for a moderator to look at and then release if the post is ok.&amp;nbsp; Exactly what it looks for, I don't know. What we've seen, though, is that perfectly innocuous posts get held, more so if they include code! We're testing out a new filter module that should behave better.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;If you get the "held for moderation" message, please be patient - your post will be released soon (but typically only during US west coast work hours.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015125#M106904</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T15:40:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Did you bring back the - send</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015126#M106905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you bring back the - send a post to the author feature?&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the note.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 16:43:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015126#M106905</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnNichols</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T16:43:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, we did bring that back.</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015127#M106906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, we did bring that back.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 18:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Review-Comment/m-p/1015127#M106906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-14T18:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

