<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is Shared Library same as DLL in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Is-Shared-Library-same-as-DLL/m-p/761679#M17166</link>
    <description>In the Linux world, it's called a "shared object" (.so), but yes, it's very much like a DLL. Unlike a DLL, you can link directly to a .so and don't need a separate "export library".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, even on Windows, a DLL is loaded automaticlaly when the program starts, whether or not you call any routines in it.  The Microsoft linker does have a "delayed load" feature which you can enable, where a "stub" is linked in that dynamically loads the DLL when the routine is called.  That behavior is not the default.  I don't know if Linux has something similar.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 21:20:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-05-27T21:20:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is Shared Library same as DLL</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Is-Shared-Library-same-as-DLL/m-p/761678#M17165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wonder if Shared Library is exacltly same as DLL in terms of its function. In Windows system, DLL is loaded when I readlly need it. That is, it is not automatically loaded when calling program is started(invoked). Is it same with Shared Library ? Acutally, I made a small program which may call or may not call - depending on the flow logic- a subroutine that is made as shared library. I am not sure if the shared library is always loaded into memory or only loaded when it is initally called. Any comment would be very much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moonkyu&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 11:46:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Is-Shared-Library-same-as-DLL/m-p/761678#M17165</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkhwang9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-27T11:46:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is Shared Library same as DLL</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Is-Shared-Library-same-as-DLL/m-p/761679#M17166</link>
      <description>In the Linux world, it's called a "shared object" (.so), but yes, it's very much like a DLL. Unlike a DLL, you can link directly to a .so and don't need a separate "export library".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, even on Windows, a DLL is loaded automaticlaly when the program starts, whether or not you call any routines in it.  The Microsoft linker does have a "delayed load" feature which you can enable, where a "stub" is linked in that dynamically loads the DLL when the routine is called.  That behavior is not the default.  I don't know if Linux has something similar.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 21:20:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Is-Shared-Library-same-as-DLL/m-p/761679#M17166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-05-27T21:20:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

