<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: even worse in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761889#M17376</link>
    <description>I moved the reply, now that I knew where it went.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The forum has an issue that if you reply while not logged in, after you log in it goes to a new topic page (but with the subject filled in making you think it is a reply) instead of as a reply. I have already reported this.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-27T21:44:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>idb : Unrecognized binary file format</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761884#M17371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have seen some old posts concerning this problem that should be fixed with the newer version of idb (post dated 26 apr 2005 from gasaladi)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BUT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=======================================================&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Fortran&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I compile the test program&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(see attached file whichpresent a trivial&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;error on line8 and also 18)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** with the32 bit version of ifort (fc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;***with the EM64T version of ifort (fce) :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/opt/intel/fc/9.0/bin/ifort -g -CB -traceback -o bound-fc.exe bound.f90&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/opt/intel/fce/9.0/bin/ifort -g -CB -traceback -o bound-fce.exe bound.f90&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(see also attached files "fc.log" and "fce.log" that contain the result&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;of compilationand link with verbose options namely: "-v -V" )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I verify that it isOK :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** file bound-fc.exe&lt;BR /&gt;bound-fc.exe: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** file bound-fce.exe&lt;BR /&gt;bound-fce.exe: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for GNU/Linux 2.4.1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) I try to debug this program :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with idg (32 bits version),it is OK :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** idb bound-fc.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Linux Application Debugger for Intel EM64T-based applications,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 9.0-10, Build 20050413&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;object file name: bound-fc.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Reading symbolic information from /home1/pichon/DEBUG/bound-fc.exe...done&lt;BR /&gt;(idb) quit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*** idb-e bound-fc.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Linux Application Debugger for Intel EM64T-based applications,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 9.0-10, Build 20050413&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;object file name: bound-fc.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Reading symbolic information from /home1/pichon/DEBUG/bound-fc.exe...done&lt;BR /&gt;(idb) quit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BUT WITH THE EM64T version, it fails !!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(We have AMD-Opteron processors and thus we are interested by the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EM64T versionsofour programs .....)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;***idb-e bound-fce.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Linux Application Debugger for Intel EM64T-based applications,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 9.0-10, Build 20050413&lt;BR /&gt;------------------&lt;BR /&gt;object file name: bound-fce.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Unrecognized binary file format for file /home1/pichon/DEBUG/bound-fce.exe&lt;BR /&gt;Could not start process for bound-fce.exe&lt;BR /&gt;No image loaded ... Recovering ...&lt;BR /&gt;(idb) quit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THE SAME with the C compiler :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel C Compiler for Intel EM64T-based applications, Version 9.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Build 20050430 Package ID: l_cc_p_9.0.021&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question : How to fix that (we think that we have the latest version of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ifort, idb, icc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yours sincerely,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bernard PICHON&lt;BR /&gt;--&lt;BR /&gt;Dr. Bernard PICHON&lt;BR /&gt;Dpartement Cassiope (UMR 6202 du CNRS)&lt;BR /&gt;Observatoire de la Cte d'Azur (OCA) Nice&lt;BR /&gt;BP 4229 06304 Nice Cedex 04&lt;BR /&gt;Telephone : 04 92 00 31 83&lt;BR /&gt;Telecopie : 04 92 00 31 21&lt;BR /&gt;Sur la toile : &lt;A href="http://www.obs-nice.fr/pichon/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.obs-nice.fr/pichon/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761884#M17371</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpichon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-22T23:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: idb : Unrecognized binary file format</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761885#M17372</link>
      <description>I would recommend that you submit an issue to Intel Premier Support about this.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:50:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761885#M17372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-06-22T23:50:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761886#M17373</link>
      <description>It seems to be even worse.&lt;BR /&gt;when compiled with -g -traceback i still get&lt;BR /&gt;forrtl: severe (408): fort: (3): Subscript #1 of the array TRACER_STATUS has value -9998which is less than the lower bound of 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source&lt;BR /&gt;test_3d            00000000004BE50E  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;test_3d            00000000004BBED2  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;libifcore.so.5     00002AAAAE6D2234  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and when using gdb I get &lt;BR /&gt;forrtl: severe (408): fort: (3): Subscript #1 of the array TRACER_STATUS has value -9998which is less than the lower bound of 1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source&lt;BR /&gt;test_3d            00000000004BE50E  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;test_3d            00000000004BBED2  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;libifcore.so.5     00002AAAAE6D2234  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Program exited with code 0230.&lt;BR /&gt;(gdb) where&lt;BR /&gt;No stack.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i run version fort (IFORT) 9.0  20050430&lt;BR /&gt;on an amd64 &lt;BR /&gt;ldd /opt/intel/fortran90/bin/fortcom&lt;BR /&gt;        linux-gate.so.1 =&amp;gt;  (0xffffe000)&lt;BR /&gt;        libm.so.6 =&amp;gt; /lib32/libm.so.6 (0x5557c000)&lt;BR /&gt;        libstdc++.so.5 =&amp;gt; /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib32/libstdc++.so.5 (0x5559f000)&lt;BR /&gt;        libgcc_s.so.1 =&amp;gt; /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib32/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x55652000)&lt;BR /&gt;        libc.so.6 =&amp;gt; /lib32/libc.so.6 (0x5565b000)&lt;BR /&gt;        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x55555000)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;will this be resolved in the next version?&lt;BR /&gt;not being able to debug is not quit an option for me&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Thomas Geenen</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:34:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761886#M17373</guid>
      <dc:creator>tgeenenat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-27T16:34:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761887#M17374</link>
      <description>this was supposed to be a reply/extension to&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=11&amp;amp;message.id=2657" target="_blank"&gt;http://softwareforums.intel.com/ids/board/message?board.id=11&amp;amp;message.id=2657&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Thomas</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:39:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761887#M17374</guid>
      <dc:creator>tgeenenat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-27T16:39:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761888#M17375</link>
      <description>I know this forum has become more difficult to use, but please, when the subject doesn't fill in correctly on your reply, discard it, log in to the forum again, and reply to the message you intend.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your original message indicates that you were using compiler 9.0.021.  Both the compiler and the idb debugger are much improved in 9.0.027.  Note that 'idb -gdb' accepts gdb style commands.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761888#M17375</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-27T19:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761889#M17376</link>
      <description>I moved the reply, now that I knew where it went.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The forum has an issue that if you reply while not logged in, after you log in it goes to a new topic page (but with the subject filled in making you think it is a reply) instead of as a reply. I have already reported this.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761889#M17376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-27T21:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761890#M17377</link>
      <description>thanks for fixing the thread &lt;BR /&gt;I looked for the 9.0.027 version of ifort but could not find it. only the 21 version. &lt;BR /&gt;ftp://download.intel.com/software/products/compilers/downloads/eval/preview&lt;BR /&gt;could you provide me with the link for the newest ifort compiler?&lt;BR /&gt;you mentioned idb-gdb does this mean that idb will work with ddd i had some troubles in the past with the combination idb ddd&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Thomas</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761890#M17377</guid>
      <dc:creator>tgeenenat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-28T18:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: even worse</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761891#M17378</link>
      <description>The 027 compiler is currently available for customers with full support.  The most recent compiler for Limited Support customers is 026.  Both are in Intel Premier Support File Downloads.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My guess is that you have not registered your serial number and are just looking at the FTP area for initial downloads.  This does not get updated on a regular basis.  Please &lt;A href="https://registrationcenter.intel.com" target="_blank"&gt;register your serial number&lt;/A&gt; and then you'll get access to Premier Support.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:19:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/idb-Unrecognized-binary-file-format/m-p/761891#M17378</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-28T20:19:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

