topic Re: Status of F2003 OOP features? in Intel® Fortran Compiler

Status of F2003 OOP features?

Izaak_Beekman — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:41:34 GMT

Does anyone know the status of F2003 OOP features in the latest ifort release? Or do they know where I can find this info without wading through loooooong release notes?

Specifically I am interested in type bound procedures and parameterized derived types. Under ifort 11.1.046 under 64bit RHEL 5 I get the following errors when trying to declare an object as a parameterized derived type:

[plain]ifort -c modErrors.f90 -warn all -check all -traceback -g -sox
modErrors.f90(43): error #5082: Syntax error, found '::' when expecting one of: ,  ;
     TYPE(error_pair(name_len=length)) :: errs(num_errs)
---------------------------------------^
[/plain]

I have quadrupal checked my code, and it appears that perhaps this hasn't been added yet? If it is supposed to be functional is this a compiler bug?

I appreciate any thoughts, comments, or assistance.

-Z

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:57:50 GMT

You should not have to wade through the release notes - there is a subsection "Fortran 2003 Feature Summary" listed in the Table of Contents. You can also find this material here.

Type-bound procedures are supported. Parameterized derived types are not.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Izaak_Beekman — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:48:37 GMT

Many thanks, Steve. Trial and error is certainly not the best way to ascertain this information. I'm starting to go a bit nuts!

-Z

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Izaak_Beekman — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:44:44 GMT

Also, I didn't see any mention of submodules (which, I know, never made it into the 2003 standard, but I think were included in some sort of provisional manner and slated to be included in F2008) in the link you posted above. Any hope to see this functionality any time soon?

-Z

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:26:35 GMT

Submodules are part of F2008. They're in our development plan for the next major release (not what I would call "soon"), but they're not done yet so I won't make any promises.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Izaak_Beekman — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:41:42 GMT

Sorry if these questions have been answered elsewhere on this forum, but

a) When do you think the next release supporting parameterized derived types will be?

b) When will the next major release be?

c) Are submodules still slated for inclusion in the next major release?

Thanks in advance,

-Z

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:58:14 GMT

a) Not yet scheduled

b) Late 2010

c) At this point it seems unlikely

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

butette — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:37:52 GMT

Steve,

Does that apply to generic interface as well ? If so I have to deicde how to work around that in my implementation. My basline compiler for F2003 feature today is the IBM xlf2003 compiler and it seems like it can handle many things that ifort can't.

Thanks.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:47:47 GMT

Generic type-bound-procedures are still on track for the late 2010 release. Submodules is the only feature we were considering that has been tentatively dropped for this next release, due to resource constraints. We still want to do it as soon as we can.

IBM xlf90 is the second-closest compiler to full F2003 there is (Cray is all the way there), but of course it doesn't run on IA platforms. We'll get there eventually. Even NAG, which historically has been first out with a new standard, is a long way from done. No other commercial implementation is close.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Izaak_Beekman — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:33:30 GMT

Quoting Steve Lionel (Intel)

a) Not yet scheduled

Does this mean this feature is a year plus out? That is very unfortunate. Parameterized derived types combined with allocatable scalars will be soooo nice...

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:31:56 GMT

Yes, I would say that parameterized derived types are more than a year out.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Anar_Yusifov — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:42:47 GMT

Quoting Steve Lionel (Intel)

Yes, I would say that parameterized derived types are more than a year out.

Are there any news aboutparameterized derived types? When do you plan to ifort will support them?

Thanks.

Re: Status of F2003 OOP features?

Steven_L_Intel1 — Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:53:07 GMT

I don't have anything more to say than I did earlier.