<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Can't Create a Fortran DLL independent of VS in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836594#M55446</link>
    <description>The first suggestion seems to work, thanks a bunch!&lt;DIV&gt;Also, the dll is not an add-in. I'm just using the 'Lib' keyword to create a subroutine out of it.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Denny_Frost</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-26T16:37:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can't Create a Fortran DLL independent of VS</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836592#M55444</link>
      <description>I have created a fortran dll using Intel Visual Fortran in VS 2008. I run this dll from excel in a VBA macro. The macro runs fine on my computer, but as soon as I try to run it on other computers in the office, excel throws and error saying it can't find the .dll file. I checked the system log where it said that it failed to find a VS 2008 library during runtime. I would like to make the .dll independent of VS 2008, which I thought it would be already. Is there a compiler setting I missed in order to keep the .dll from using system libraries? Any help would be appreciated!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836592#M55444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Denny_Frost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-20T17:40:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can't Create a Fortran DLL independent of VS</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836593#M55445</link>
      <description>You need to link against static libraries when you build the DLL. So use the "Multithreaded" Runtime Library option under Fortran / Libraries.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, are you using an Excel Add-In in your Workbook to link to the DLL? If so, Excel puts a hidden path into your workbook which links to this Add-In. This path includes your userid, and so does not work on another computer or for another user. I have found it useful to put the Add-In into XLSTART instead of into the Add-Ins folder, as this does not demonstrate the same issue. I consider this a bug with the Excel Add-Ins system, but don't hold your breath for it to be fixed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;David</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836593#M55445</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T06:12:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can't Create a Fortran DLL independent of VS</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836594#M55446</link>
      <description>The first suggestion seems to work, thanks a bunch!&lt;DIV&gt;Also, the dll is not an add-in. I'm just using the 'Lib' keyword to create a subroutine out of it.&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Can-t-Create-a-Fortran-DLL-independent-of-VS/m-p/836594#M55446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Denny_Frost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-26T16:37:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

