<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Different behaviour on code compiled with /Qopenmp option but with no omp directives in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Different-behaviour-on-code-compiled-with-Qopenmp-option-but/m-p/867129#M71001</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I recently upgraded to version 11.1 of the IVF compiler. I noticed that if I compile the same code with and without the /Qopenmp option the results can sometimes be different even if I'm not using any omp directive in the code. I have been assuming that the result would be the same, is that correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In summary, if no omp directives are used, can the /Qopenmp option affect the outcome?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Juan&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:29:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Juan_Senent</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-17T22:29:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different behaviour on code compiled with /Qopenmp option but with no omp directives</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Different-behaviour-on-code-compiled-with-Qopenmp-option-but/m-p/867129#M71001</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I recently upgraded to version 11.1 of the IVF compiler. I noticed that if I compile the same code with and without the /Qopenmp option the results can sometimes be different even if I'm not using any omp directive in the code. I have been assuming that the result would be the same, is that correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In summary, if no omp directives are used, can the /Qopenmp option affect the outcome?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Juan&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:29:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Different-behaviour-on-code-compiled-with-Qopenmp-option-but/m-p/867129#M71001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_Senent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T22:29:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Different behaviour on code compiled with /Qopenmp option but w</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Different-behaviour-on-code-compiled-with-Qopenmp-option-but/m-p/867130#M71002</link>
      <description>Yes, absolutely. One big difference is that with /Qopenmp, all local variables are allocated on the stack by default, whereas without it, arrays are statically allocated. If your program references uninitialized array elements, you can see a difference.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Different-behaviour-on-code-compiled-with-Qopenmp-option-but/m-p/867130#M71002</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-17T23:17:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

