<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Possible INCLUDE/USE bug in IVF-11? in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890046#M77971</link>
    <description>In building a solution for legacy code that worked properly under IVF-10, IVF-11 is complaining about a missing module file for a USE statement. It appears that 3 files are involved in the bug:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alpha.f90 contains an INCLUDE for beta.fi, which in turn has a USE for gamma.f90&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Under IVF-10, I observed that gamma.f90 was compiled early in the build process, whereas in IVF-11, I don't see it compiling before the error occurs...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;beta.fi(28): error #7002: Error in opening the compiled module file.  Check INCLUDE paths.   [GAMMA]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All the files involved are in the same project folder, so I can't use project dependency. Although I know I can move them into different projects to get it working, the fact that it worked correctly in IVF-10 seems to imply that a single project structure isn't the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My current workaround is:&lt;BR /&gt;1) Clean Solution&lt;BR /&gt;2) compile gamma.f90 by itself (rt click, compile)&lt;BR /&gt;3) Build Solution&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... but I'd like to do it the way it used to work in IVF-10.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a known bug, or is there something new I have to do in IVF-11 to make this work?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thx, Longden&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:18:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>longden_loo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-01T21:18:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible INCLUDE/USE bug in IVF-11?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890046#M77971</link>
      <description>In building a solution for legacy code that worked properly under IVF-10, IVF-11 is complaining about a missing module file for a USE statement. It appears that 3 files are involved in the bug:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;alpha.f90 contains an INCLUDE for beta.fi, which in turn has a USE for gamma.f90&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Under IVF-10, I observed that gamma.f90 was compiled early in the build process, whereas in IVF-11, I don't see it compiling before the error occurs...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;beta.fi(28): error #7002: Error in opening the compiled module file.  Check INCLUDE paths.   [GAMMA]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All the files involved are in the same project folder, so I can't use project dependency. Although I know I can move them into different projects to get it working, the fact that it worked correctly in IVF-10 seems to imply that a single project structure isn't the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My current workaround is:&lt;BR /&gt;1) Clean Solution&lt;BR /&gt;2) compile gamma.f90 by itself (rt click, compile)&lt;BR /&gt;3) Build Solution&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... but I'd like to do it the way it used to work in IVF-10.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a known bug, or is there something new I have to do in IVF-11 to make this work?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thx, Longden&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:18:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890046#M77971</guid>
      <dc:creator>longden_loo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01T21:18:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible INCLUDE/USE bug in IVF-11?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890047#M77972</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
It sounds as if the dependency analyzer in our Visual Studio integration is getting this wrong. Can you attach a ZIP of the project after a Build &amp;gt; Clean? If you don't want to do it here, submit it to Intel Premier Support.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890047#M77972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01T21:38:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible INCLUDE/USE bug in IVF-11?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890048#M77973</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336209"&gt;Steve Lionel (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; It sounds as if the dependency analyzer in our Visual Studio integration is getting this wrong. Can you attach a ZIP of the project after a Build &amp;gt; Clean? If you don't want to do it here, submit it to Intel Premier Support.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;I'll have to create a sanitized version, so it'll have to wait till I have some more time. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess I was fishing for the proverbial low hanging fruit, and hoping someone already had a solution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thx.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890048#M77973</guid>
      <dc:creator>longden_loo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01T21:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Possible INCLUDE/USE bug in IVF-11?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890049#M77974</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Check to make sure you don't have a circular dependency in your USEs.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Possible-INCLUDE-USE-bug-in-IVF-11/m-p/890049#M77974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-02T00:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

