<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic External Procedures/Calling Conventions Differences Between CVF &amp; IVF in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/External-Procedures-Calling-Conventions-Differences-Between-CVF/m-p/894097#M79157</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In getting my applications ported &amp;amp; working from CVF to IVF, I noticed something odd. Why did I have to change the External Procedures -String Length Argument Passing setting from "After String Arg*" in CVF to "After All Arguments" in IVF in order to get everything working??&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, the Argument Passing Conventions (CVF) &amp;amp; Calling Conventions (IVF) would *only* work in the "default" setting (whatever that is...). I thought in IVF, selecting the CVF setting would be...more correct (coming from CVF, after all) but that did not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;More details as to these issues would be nice :-)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jkrob</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-12T04:30:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>External Procedures/Calling Conventions Differences Between CVF &amp; IVF</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/External-Procedures-Calling-Conventions-Differences-Between-CVF/m-p/894097#M79157</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In getting my applications ported &amp;amp; working from CVF to IVF, I noticed something odd. Why did I have to change the External Procedures -String Length Argument Passing setting from "After String Arg*" in CVF to "After All Arguments" in IVF in order to get everything working??&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, the Argument Passing Conventions (CVF) &amp;amp; Calling Conventions (IVF) would *only* work in the "default" setting (whatever that is...). I thought in IVF, selecting the CVF setting would be...more correct (coming from CVF, after all) but that did not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;More details as to these issues would be nice :-)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/External-Procedures-Calling-Conventions-Differences-Between-CVF/m-p/894097#M79157</guid>
      <dc:creator>jkrob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T04:30:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>External Procedures/Calling Conventions Differences Between CVF</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/External-Procedures-Calling-Conventions-Differences-Between-CVF/m-p/894098#M79158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you read Steve's article, according to the URL at the top of the forum?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/migrating-from-compaq-visual-fortran/"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/migrating-from-compaq-visual-fortran/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/External-Procedures-Calling-Conventions-Differences-Between-CVF/m-p/894098#M79158</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T13:48:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

