<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic No, there isn't. You would in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928163#M87101</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;No, there isn't. You would benefit from the Fortran 2008 SUBMODULE feature, but we don't have that yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-30T18:37:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Faster compilation by not recompiling dependencies</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928162#M87100</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a large object oriented groundwater modeling code&amp;nbsp;(e.g. 70K lines in ~100 files) written in Fortran 2003 (I use pointers, linked lists, pointers to procedures, classes extensively as every process model or dataset is an object). &amp;nbsp;When debugging and updating lower level classes/modules, I have to recompile nearly all the code over and over when testing, even though my changes do not affect other portions of the code. &amp;nbsp;Yes, this is the desired behavior of a compiler since code mods may affect other portions of the code, thus the need for dependency checks. &amp;nbsp;However, I am confident that my changes are simple and do not affect other portions of the code under these circumstances. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Short of decomposing my code into separate libraries, is there a way to temporarily shut down dependency checks within Intel Visual Fortran (2013)? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I accomplish this on my Linux box by removing my dependency list from the makefile, but I find that Linux debuggers (e.g. TotalView) are not nearly as convenient as Visual Studio.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:06:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928162#M87100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Glenn_Hammond</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T18:06:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No, there isn't. You would</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928163#M87101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, there isn't. You would benefit from the Fortran 2008 SUBMODULE feature, but we don't have that yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928163#M87101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T18:37:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does that mean SUBMOULE is in</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928164#M87102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does that mean SUBMOULE&amp;nbsp;is in the development pipeline ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928164#M87102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T20:28:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It is, but I don't want to</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928165#M87103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is, but I don't want to predict when it will appear.&amp;nbsp; Not this year - it's probably the most difficult part of F2008 we haven't done yet. It will be a major rip-up of our module implementation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Faster-compilation-by-not-recompiling-dependencies/m-p/928165#M87103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T20:55:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

