topic I assume this is a QuickWin in Intel® Fortran Compiler

How best to isolate console output from graphics?

WSinc — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:30:16 GMT

I am trying to debug a graphics app but there is a lot of console output

involved for the computations being done. There are also READ statements which

solicit input quantities.

The problem is - the WRITE statements (or PRINT) causes a lot of scrolling,

which destroys the graphics output. How can I prevent that?

For example can I put the WRITE statements in a separate window?

Can I assign for example, assign a LOGICAL unit that would associate those WRITE statements

with a different window? Or is there a way to do WRAP AROUND of WRITE statements wthout any scrolling?

Ideally I would be able to scroll the WRITE outputs without affecting the graphics, but I don't know if that is possible

with the current software.

Any suggestions?

BTW, a good enhancement would be to enable opening a separate CONSOLE window from a GRAPHICS window, each

one having its particular characterisitics. The CONSOLE window would allow scrolling of text. That would solve this problem.

I assume this is a QuickWin

Steven_L_Intel1 — Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:14:24 GMT

I assume this is a QuickWin app. You can open a separate unit with FILE='USER' and use that for your text output. This will go to a separate window within the QuickWin MDI interface.

I tried that, but it was a

WSinc — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:29:34 GMT

I tried that, but it was a confused mess. when i did OPEN(7,file="user") it did open a window called UNIT7, but then all the graphics stuff went into there also. I want the graphics to go into a DIFFERENTwindow so they don't screw each other up. So do I have to keep SWITCHING them back and forth? That seems pretty awkward and clumsy programming.

Ah, I see I forgot something.

Steven_L_Intel1 — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:36:56 GMT

Ah, I see I forgot something. You have to call SETACTIVEQQ to unit 6 to cause the graphics to go to the default window. I think your WRITEs to unit 7 will separate automatically. I'm not super-familiar with this part of QuickWin so I suggest studying the documentation and looking at the various QuickWin routines available.

Would the regular graphics

WSinc — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:25:45 GMT

Would the regular graphics windows rather than QuickWin be easier to implement this way? Are there any articles about this?

BTW, does the new Fortran

WSinc — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:28:56 GMT

BTW, does the new Fortran edition come with the repaired debugging environment we talked about in a previous post? Where it was giving exceptions, and cryptic error messages when modifying source code - - - I looked at the release notes, did not find any mention of it.

Many issues were fixed in the

Steven_L_Intel1 — Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:39:41 GMT

Many issues were fixed in the development environment in Update 1. Please try it. The release notes don't tend to describe fixes - there is a separate "README" file posted with the downloads that has those. I doubt you would find using the Windows API for graphics easier than QuickWin, and it would not allow you to do Fortran I/O to a window.