<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;There is no significant in Intel® Fortran Compiler</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978648#M99181</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;There is no significant speed difference between a 32-bit and 64-bit program on the same computer&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;32-bit program running on 64-bit Win OS can run slower because of WOW64 induced&amp;nbsp;overhead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-26T07:25:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Instalation problem</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978639#M99172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Steve,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I solved the previous problem and instaled the Intel® Visual Fortran Composer XE 2013 with Microsoft Visual Studio 2008. Everthing seems to be correct. But afterwards I carried out some tests. Despite the fact that I build Intel® 64 architecture application, the program run as 32.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am using HP, Intel Core i3-2330M, 2.20GHz, W7 Ultimate 64-bit.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance for any help you can provide&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is the profe that I have used the x64 for compilation:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1&amp;gt;------ Build started:&amp;nbsp; Configuration: Debug x64 ------&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Compiling with Intel(R) Visual Fortran Compiler XE 13.1.0.149 [Intel(R) 64]...&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;RYCHLOSTNI_OP.FOR&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Linking...&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Embedding manifest...&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Build log written to &amp;nbsp;.....&lt;BR /&gt;=== Build: 1 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ====&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:38:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978639#M99172</guid>
      <dc:creator>Václav_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-23T11:38:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What do you mean "the program</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978640#M99173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean "the program runs as 32"? The log you show indicates a successful 64-bit build.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978640#M99173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-24T13:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:I solved the previous</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978641#M99174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;I solved the previous problem and...&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; If that is relevant to the present thread, please give a reference/link and state how it is connected to the present thread. Failing that, unless the "previous problem" had unusually interesting ingredients, most of the hundreds of readers of this forum would not have any idea what that problem was.&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978641#M99174</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-24T15:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The "previous problem" was</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978642#M99175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The "previous problem" was &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/topic/373757" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/topic/373757&lt;/A&gt; and it has no connection that I can see with this new issue, though I don't yet understand what the new problem is. It isn't an installation issue. I'm pretty sure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:46:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978642#M99175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-24T16:46:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I am sorry for inaccurate</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978643#M99176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am sorry for inaccurate definition of the problem. &lt;BR /&gt;I have no clue what is happening now, but what I can see is when I run the program compiled like I described I am not able to reach the expected speed. I have a version of this aplication built with another 64 bit compiler on another computer a it's run much much faster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978643#M99176</guid>
      <dc:creator>Václav_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-25T08:43:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There is no significant speed</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978644#M99177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no significant speed difference between a 32-bit and 64-bit program on the same computer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978644#M99177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven_L_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-25T12:51:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:I am not able to reach</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978645#M99178</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;I am not able to reach the expected speed. I have a version of this aplication built with another 64 bit compiler on another computer a it's run much much faster.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

I think that you are jumping to conclusions with hardly any basis. How did you estimate "the expected speed"?

The speed of 64-bit processors covers a wide range. The speed of your program depends, among others, on the CPU, the amount of cache, the OS, the speed of the I/O subsystem and the devices used, the number of threads used. How do the two different systems that you tried compare in regard to these attributes?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:20:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978645#M99178</guid>
      <dc:creator>mecej4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-25T14:20:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have compiled the</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978646#M99179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have compiled the aplication on another computer with&amp;nbsp;Intel® Visual Fortran Composer XE 2011 and made a test of comparing speed difference between 32-bit and 64-bit compiler. You are right, it is almost same. But both of them are realy much faster, than the version compiled with&amp;nbsp;Intel® Visual Fortran Composer XE 2013 on my notebook. &amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978646#M99179</guid>
      <dc:creator>Václav_H_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-25T14:27:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>If you are worried about</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978647#M99180</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you are worried about speed then don't use a debug build.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;Václav H. wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;This is the profe that I have used the x64 for compilation:&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1&amp;gt;------ Build started:&amp;nbsp; Configuration: &lt;STRONG&gt;Debug&lt;/STRONG&gt; x64 ------&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Compiling with Intel(R) Visual Fortran Compiler XE 13.1.0.149 [Intel(R) 64]...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:36:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978647#M99180</guid>
      <dc:creator>IanH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-25T19:36:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&gt;&gt;&gt;There is no significant</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978648#M99181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;There is no significant speed difference between a 32-bit and 64-bit program on the same computer&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;32-bit program running on 64-bit Win OS can run slower because of WOW64 induced&amp;nbsp;overhead.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978648#M99181</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-26T07:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quote:IanH wrote:</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978649#M99182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;IanH wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are worried about speed then don't use a debug build.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Quote:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Václav H.&lt;/EM&gt;wrote:This is the profe that I have used the x64 for compilation:
&lt;P&gt;1&amp;gt;------ Build started:&amp;nbsp; Configuration: &lt;STRONG&gt;Debug&lt;/STRONG&gt; x64 ------&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;gt;Compiling with Intel(R) Visual Fortran Compiler XE 13.1.0.149 [Intel(R) 64]...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Debug build will add some overhead in function's prolog for example filling buffer with 0xcc instructions by using &lt;STRONG&gt;rep movs &lt;/STRONG&gt;instruction.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 07:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Instalation-problem/m-p/978649#M99182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-26T07:44:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

