topic Re: bug report: intel fortran compiler 9.1, intrinsic function in Intel® Fortran Compiler

bug report: intel fortran compiler 9.1, intrinsic function dcosd

shiyin — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:21:25 GMT

Try this code:

program testRa
double precision:: ra

Ra=359.9
print *,dcosd(Ra),dcosd(Ra-360)

end

compile with ifort (v9.1)

The output is
0.768461121150065 0.999998476727358

The first number is obviously wrong!!!

Using compiler ifc7.1, the output is correct.

Re: bug report: intel fortran compiler 9.1, intrinsic function

shiyin — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:26:24 GMT

ps. It is the compiler for Linux.

Re: bug report: intel fortran compiler 9.1, intrinsic function

TimP — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:43:58 GMT

When you take so many risks in your code, a number of things can go wrong, depending on the options you choose, and exact compiler version. What happens if you declare dcosd, and change 359.9 to a double precision constant?
I don't see a problem until the 10th digit when I run this, but I'm sure I don't have the same compiler build.

Re: bug report: intel fortran compiler 9.1, intrinsic function

Steven_L_Intel1 — Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:09:37 GMT

dcosd is an intrinsic so you don't need to declare it. Tim is correct that the 359.9 should be 359.9D0, but that doesn't make a large difference.

I can't reproduce the results you are seeing. I get:

0.999998476727358 0.999998476727358

if I use 359.9D0 I get:

0.999998476913288 0.999998476913288

What is the exact version of the compiler you are using? If 9.1.037, which is the latest, please send a test case to Intel Premier Support.