<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel ARC and Video coding -continued in Graphics</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding-continued/m-p/1473546#M116020</link>
    <description>Previously
"Helle everybody, Does Intel ARC decode and encode VP9 ? I would like to use Intel Arc A770 with Davinco resolve, it would working great as Quick Sync, Herper encode ? Thanks you" 

After some searchs from my side, most of the decoding and encoding tasks are done by the IGPU (12th-13th generation). This IGPU is called Quick Sync. Intel ARC decode/encode H.264, H.265 and AV1 only decode VP9. The iGPU decode/encode a cetain flavor of VP9, It seems that the Intel iGPU or Quick Sync in far more superior to the intel ARC :  more codecs and the performing than the Intel ARC. Using Intel ARC+IGPU will increase the performance "Hyper encode". It works essentialy with H.264-H265-AV1-VP9.  Some deception, thinking the Intel ARC will perform better than Quick Sync. Maybe for next generation</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 18:17:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Winphet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-05T18:17:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel ARC and Video coding -continued</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding-continued/m-p/1473546#M116020</link>
      <description>Previously
"Helle everybody, Does Intel ARC decode and encode VP9 ? I would like to use Intel Arc A770 with Davinco resolve, it would working great as Quick Sync, Herper encode ? Thanks you" 

After some searchs from my side, most of the decoding and encoding tasks are done by the IGPU (12th-13th generation). This IGPU is called Quick Sync. Intel ARC decode/encode H.264, H.265 and AV1 only decode VP9. The iGPU decode/encode a cetain flavor of VP9, It seems that the Intel iGPU or Quick Sync in far more superior to the intel ARC :  more codecs and the performing than the Intel ARC. Using Intel ARC+IGPU will increase the performance "Hyper encode". It works essentialy with H.264-H265-AV1-VP9.  Some deception, thinking the Intel ARC will perform better than Quick Sync. Maybe for next generation</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 18:17:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding-continued/m-p/1473546#M116020</guid>
      <dc:creator>Winphet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-05T18:17:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re:Intel ARC and Video coding -continued</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding-continued/m-p/1473970#M116077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Winphet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for posting on the Intel Communities. We noticed that this is a duplicate thread from your thread with the title &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding/m-p/1472756#M115943" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Intel ARC and Video coding&lt;/A&gt;. Please continue to reply in the original thread to prevent duplicate topics. We will now close this thread. Thank you for your understanding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hugo O.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Intel Customer Support Technician.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 20:47:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/Intel-ARC-and-Video-coding-continued/m-p/1473970#M116077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hugo_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-06T20:47:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

