https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/880x480-in-XPe-IEGD/m-p/435954#M38405 <P>I suggest that you checked through the Embedded Community for these kind of questions. To do this, please follow this URL: </P><P></P><P><A href="http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en">http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en</A> <A href="http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en">http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en</A></P> Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:05:15 GMT DArce 2013-06-17T19:05:15Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/880x480-in-XPe-IEGD/m-p/435953#M38404 <P>Hello everyone,</P><P></P><P>I'm facing a customer's hardware setup, consisting of an Atom N450-based PC and a VGA-attached display (no DDC) with a likely native resolution of 880x480. I can configure a DTD in IEGD 10.3.1 for 800x480@60 and it works (note that the default DTD for that resolution, provided by Intel, is pretty sick, the blank space is too large). If I try 880x480 or 904x480 or anything in that vein, the resulting IEGD build installed on the target machine doesn't offer that resolution - not in the "show all resolutions" dialog, not in the IEGD GUI.</P><P></P><P>Any ideas are welcome... is this a Windows feature? Is this an IEGD feature?</P><P>Thanks in advance for any responses.</P> Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:32:05 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/880x480-in-XPe-IEGD/m-p/435953#M38404 FRysa 2013-06-14T13:32:05Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/880x480-in-XPe-IEGD/m-p/435954#M38405 <P>I suggest that you checked through the Embedded Community for these kind of questions. To do this, please follow this URL: </P><P></P><P><A href="http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en">http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en</A> <A href="http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en">http://embedded.communities.intel.com/community/en</A></P> Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:05:15 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Graphics/880x480-in-XPe-IEGD/m-p/435954#M38405 DArce 2013-06-17T19:05:15Z