https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Graphics-Performance/GPA-No-UV-map-support/m-p/1080077#M1364 <P>Is it possible to get the UV maps from the ergs? They're needed to have the textures assigned properly. Saving geometry without UVs makes these geometry almost useless for tests.</P> <P>If not, then it would be a great idea to have this as a new feature in the next update.</P> Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:30:25 GMT BugMe_N_ 2016-09-17T11:30:25Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Graphics-Performance/GPA-No-UV-map-support/m-p/1080077#M1364 <P>Is it possible to get the UV maps from the ergs? They're needed to have the textures assigned properly. Saving geometry without UVs makes these geometry almost useless for tests.</P> <P>If not, then it would be a great idea to have this as a new feature in the next update.</P> Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:30:25 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Graphics-Performance/GPA-No-UV-map-support/m-p/1080077#M1364 BugMe_N_ 2016-09-17T11:30:25Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Graphics-Performance/GPA-No-UV-map-support/m-p/1080078#M1365 <P>Hello,&nbsp;</P> <P>Currently, we can't export the UV maps associated with the geometry in the DX 9-11 version of the tool. &nbsp;But I believe it's possible in the DX12 version of the tool. &nbsp;</P> <P>Which graphics API is your application using?</P> <P>Thanks!</P> <P>Setth</P> Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:08:28 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Graphics-Performance/GPA-No-UV-map-support/m-p/1080078#M1365 Seth_S_Intel 2016-09-19T17:08:28Z