<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 l in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880889#M10195</link>
    <description>Dear Milos and Alexander,&lt;BR /&gt;I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with LabelMarkers. Like you, I also need to analyse (quantity, areas) the different blobs I have in my current image but don't know how. I tried to do this with openCV function cvFindContours, but the blobs disappear and instead I only get fuzzy white points in the borders of what used to be real blobs... I couldn't find out the cause of this, so I decided to analyse the blobs directly with IPP. Could you please give me an example of the steps and functions and their parameters to analyse blobs?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for any help you guys may give me,&lt;BR /&gt;Boris&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>apolo74</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-09T13:49:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 limit?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880885#M10191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am using the LabelMarkers function(IPP 5.2 beta) as a image "blob" finder and it has worked great except for the fact that you can only distinguish up to 255 blobs. After 255it resets marking to 1 so you end up with multiple blobs with the same marking.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are there any efficient ways toget around this? I am planningon submittinga suggestion to Premier Support to possibly have the function return a 16u marker image, but I wanted to see if you had any suggestions to work around this problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Milos&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880885#M10191</guid>
      <dc:creator>losh96</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-23T14:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 l</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880886#M10192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, Milos,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are right, the existing segmentation functions in IPP use 8u data for marker values ie labels from 1 to 255 are possible. Even more, 255 or 254 values are used in segmentation functions so the recommended values are from 1 to 253. If an image contains more markers they labels are repeated from minLabel to maxLabel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are going to add segmentation functionality using 16umarkers. Your submitting of this issue to premier site will help us in it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What do you think on segmentation of 16u and 32f images?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880886#M10192</guid>
      <dc:creator>Intel_C_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-26T06:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 l</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880887#M10193</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Alexander,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.It would be great if you added segmentation functionality using 16u and 32fmarkers, especially in the 16u case since it will increase the number of labels dramatically. I currently don't have a need to segment 32f images, but I am sure there are people out there to whom that might be useful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the 16u functionalitysomething that would be available with the final version of IPP 5.2?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Milos&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:52:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880887#M10193</guid>
      <dc:creator>losh96</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-02-26T21:52:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 l</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880888#M10194</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Milos,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;unfortunately functionality of IPP 5.2 already frozen, we are at the middle stages of preparing release, so we only can add this functionality after IPP 5.2 release.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880888#M10194</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-02T17:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LabelMarkers function - any way around the MaxLabel = 255 l</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880889#M10195</link>
      <description>Dear Milos and Alexander,&lt;BR /&gt;I would appreciate very much if you give me a hand with LabelMarkers. Like you, I also need to analyse (quantity, areas) the different blobs I have in my current image but don't know how. I tried to do this with openCV function cvFindContours, but the blobs disappear and instead I only get fuzzy white points in the borders of what used to be real blobs... I couldn't find out the cause of this, so I decided to analyse the blobs directly with IPP. Could you please give me an example of the steps and functions and their parameters to analyse blobs?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for any help you guys may give me,&lt;BR /&gt;Boris&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/LabelMarkers-function-any-way-around-the-MaxLabel-255-limit/m-p/880889#M10195</guid>
      <dc:creator>apolo74</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-09T13:49:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

