<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why a separate function SuperSampling? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-a-separate-function-SuperSampling/m-p/881262#M10230</link>
    <description>Since the functions Resize() and ResizeSqrPixel() can do interpolation using super sampling, why does IPP 6.1B contain a separate function SuperSampling()?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is that function faster?&lt;BR /&gt;Does it have a smaller memory footprint?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The PDF does not indicate any of this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I ask because I would like to know if it is worthwhile to make a special-case for when super sampling an image.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thomas_Jensen1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-15T15:41:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why a separate function SuperSampling?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-a-separate-function-SuperSampling/m-p/881262#M10230</link>
      <description>Since the functions Resize() and ResizeSqrPixel() can do interpolation using super sampling, why does IPP 6.1B contain a separate function SuperSampling()?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is that function faster?&lt;BR /&gt;Does it have a smaller memory footprint?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The PDF does not indicate any of this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I ask because I would like to know if it is worthwhile to make a special-case for when super sampling an image.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-a-separate-function-SuperSampling/m-p/881262#M10230</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Jensen1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-15T15:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why a separate function SuperSampling?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-a-separate-function-SuperSampling/m-p/881263#M10231</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;separable functions allow you to minimize amount of memory used for internal buffers. This particular function was created byIPP customers request.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-a-separate-function-SuperSampling/m-p/881263#M10231</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-16T10:20:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

