https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-In-place-vs-regular/m-p/881412#M10239 <DIV style="margin:0px;">Hello,</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;">I think in-place operations faster (better data locality). You may check real data with IPP performance system found at IPP/tools/perfsys/data folder of your IPP installation folder</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;">Vladimir</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;"></DIV> <P></P> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:53:30 GMT Vladimir_Dudnik 2008-12-16T18:53:30Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-In-place-vs-regular/m-p/881411#M10238 <P>Hi</P> <P></P> <P>Is there a difference in computation speed between e.g. ippsFIR_16s_Sfs and ippsFIR_16s_ISfs, i.e. regular compared to in-place operation?</P> <P></P> <P>Thor Andreas</P> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:36:29 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-In-place-vs-regular/m-p/881411#M10238 thorsan 2008-12-16T09:36:29Z https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-In-place-vs-regular/m-p/881412#M10239 <DIV style="margin:0px;">Hello,</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;">I think in-place operations faster (better data locality). You may check real data with IPP performance system found at IPP/tools/perfsys/data folder of your IPP installation folder</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;">Vladimir</DIV> <DIV style="margin:0px;"></DIV> <P></P> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:53:30 GMT https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-In-place-vs-regular/m-p/881412#M10239 Vladimir_Dudnik 2008-12-16T18:53:30Z