<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884060#M10498</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. You can submit your request to &lt;A href="http://premier.intel.com"&gt;Intel Premier Support&lt;/A&gt;, so it will be revised for the next version of IPP sample.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-28T04:35:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884055#M10493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not the usual problems though. I can build the library but the problem is what gets included into it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;
-defaultlib:"libmmd" -defaultlib:"MSVCRT" -defaultlib:"libirc" -defaultlib:"svml_disp" -defaultlib:"OLDNAMES"
&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you spot the problem here?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's right, MSVCRT does not belong there because it conflicts with LIBCMT!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why don't you people fix those makefiles already so that only the neccessary libs get included?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884055#M10493</guid>
      <dc:creator>levicki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-22T13:50:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884056#M10494</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Igor,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;let me clarify the issue. So your point is that MSVCRT should not be included into the library in IPP zlib sample?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 09:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884056#M10494</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-27T09:28:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884057#M10495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Vladimir, I have a test project which links against ipp_zlib. That project is linked statically against CRT (/MT switch). I am seeing a conflict between MSVCRT which gets included by ipp_zlib, and LIBCMT which is used by the test project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So basically I am saying that it would be nice to be able to also build ipp_zlib with LIBCMT instead of MSVCRT.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884057#M10495</guid>
      <dc:creator>levicki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-27T16:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884058#M10496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see your point. Fortunately, ipp_zlib sample is available in sources, so you can tune it for your specific needs easely, right?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884058#M10496</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-27T18:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884059#M10497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sure, I just thought that it would be nice to have an option for that in build batch files in next revision.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884059#M10497</guid>
      <dc:creator>levicki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-27T21:31:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP 6.0 zlib sample build problems</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884060#M10498</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see. You can submit your request to &lt;A href="http://premier.intel.com"&gt;Intel Premier Support&lt;/A&gt;, so it will be revised for the next version of IPP sample.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:35:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-6-0-zlib-sample-build-problems/m-p/884060#M10498</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-28T04:35:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

