<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884487#M10538</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Also, no it's not fixed point, but floating point. Those functions are functions that eat a lot of CPU but can be approximated with less accuracy for less CPU, that's why they are there. Even though there are native instructions to divide, it's still a very slow process, whilethe CPU can do several multiplications per cycle, hence nothing to speed up here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gol</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-15T03:47:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884485#M10536</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From the Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions listed in Vol 1/Signal Processing/Chapter 12 I do not see multiplication, addition and subtraction - do I miss something?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also I suppose Ipp32f notation which generally means floating point, to be interpred as fixed point in the context of Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions. Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Courier;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:54:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884485#M10536</guid>
      <dc:creator>constantine-vassilev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-11T21:54:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884486#M10537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;those operations are so basic that it would surely be less efficient to achieve less accuracy, there would be no point&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:42:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884486#M10537</guid>
      <dc:creator>gol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-15T03:42:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884487#M10538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Also, no it's not fixed point, but floating point. Those functions are functions that eat a lot of CPU but can be approximated with less accuracy for less CPU, that's why they are there. Even though there are native instructions to divide, it's still a very slow process, whilethe CPU can do several multiplications per cycle, hence nothing to speed up here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884487#M10538</guid>
      <dc:creator>gol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-15T03:47:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884488#M10539</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/235876"&gt;gol&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, no it's not fixed point, but floating point. Those functions are functions that eat a lot of CPU but can be approximated with less accuracy for less CPU, that's why they are there. Even though there are native instructions to divide, it's still a very slow process, whilethe CPU can do several multiplications per cycle, hence nothing to speed up here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;looking at their header files I see all oprations, obviously documentation is not full.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884488#M10539</guid>
      <dc:creator>constantine-vassilev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-15T04:57:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fixed-Accuracy Arithmetic Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884489#M10540</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;all IPP fnctions should be listed in documentation. Could you please point to which function you did not find reference in IPP manual?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Fixed-Accuracy-Arithmetic-Functions/m-p/884489#M10540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-15T05:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

