<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wiener function : bug in the doc? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775658#M1113</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was wondering whether there is a bug in the doc of the Wiener filter function:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch9/functn_FilterWiener.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch9/functn_FilterWiener.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;THe doc says that the output is computed as:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Y = u + ( s^2 - n^2 )/ s^2 * ( x - u )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Where:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Y : filtered pixel output&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;u : average around that pixel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;s^2 : stdDev around that pixel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;n^2 : estimate of the noise stdDev&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;x : pixel value (src image)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What happens when s^2 &amp;lt; n^2 ? According to the equation, the output value would be inverted wrt to the input. Is there a sqr missing .. or am I completely lost ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gilbert&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>georgiswan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-21T22:46:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wiener function : bug in the doc?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775658#M1113</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was wondering whether there is a bug in the doc of the Wiener filter function:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch9/functn_FilterWiener.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/documentation/hpc/ipp/ippi/ippi_ch9/functn_FilterWiener.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;THe doc says that the output is computed as:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Y = u + ( s^2 - n^2 )/ s^2 * ( x - u )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Where:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Y : filtered pixel output&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;u : average around that pixel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;s^2 : stdDev around that pixel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;n^2 : estimate of the noise stdDev&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;x : pixel value (src image)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What happens when s^2 &amp;lt; n^2 ? According to the equation, the output value would be inverted wrt to the input. Is there a sqr missing .. or am I completely lost ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gilbert&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:46:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775658#M1113</guid>
      <dc:creator>georgiswan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-21T22:46:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wiener function : bug in the doc?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775659#M1114</link>
      <description>Hello Gilbert,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't claim to understand the intricacies of the Wiener function, or its derivation. However; if you peruse the net you'll find this definition is consistent.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Paul</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775659#M1114</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulF_IntelCorp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-23T17:15:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wiener function : bug in the doc?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775660#M1115</link>
      <description>Hi Paul,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are right, I also found the same definition on other sites. I still think that this is bad (possibility of signal inversion -- why would a filter do that?) but it has nothing with the IPP implementation. I probably need to improve my understanding on the basics of the Wiener filter.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gilbert</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Wiener-function-bug-in-the-doc/m-p/775660#M1115</guid>
      <dc:creator>georgiswan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-30T16:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

