<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IPP on AMD64 processor in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-on-AMD64-processor/m-p/890782#M11429</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what version of IPP do you use (I'm asking because there was some change in IPP dispatching on non-Intel systems from IPP 5.0)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-12T03:56:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP on AMD64 processor</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-on-AMD64-processor/m-p/890781#M11428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am trying to use IPP to compute dot product of two 16-bit integer vectors. My CPU is Athlon 64. I discovered that IPP function &lt;FONT size="2"&gt;ippsDotProd_16s64s &lt;/FONT&gt;does not use SSE[1,2,3] instructions if 64-bit version is used, while32-bit version does employ SSE3 ones. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ippGetCpuType() correctly detects that my processor type as ippCpuX8664. I have tried to explicitly enable SSE3 in IPP by calling &lt;FONT size="2"&gt;ippStaticInitCpu(ippCpuSSE3), but this did notchange anything. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;The following presents the normalized time required to compute the dot product explicitly in C, by using SSE2 intrinsics, and by using IPP, respectively. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;32-bit: 1.68991e-009 5.26428e-010 5.79834e-010 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;64-bit: 1.9455e-009 6.2561e-010 1.89972e-009&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;IPP-based implementation is &lt;FONT color="#ff0000"&gt;3 times slower &lt;/FONT&gt;than hand-coded SSE2 one. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Does anybody know ifit ispossible to make IPP to work on AMD processors in 64-bit mode?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P. Trifonov&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-on-AMD64-processor/m-p/890781#M11428</guid>
      <dc:creator>ptrifonov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-05T18:15:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPP on AMD64 processor</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-on-AMD64-processor/m-p/890782#M11429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what version of IPP do you use (I'm asking because there was some change in IPP dispatching on non-Intel systems from IPP 5.0)?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-on-AMD64-processor/m-p/890782#M11429</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-12T03:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

