<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893130#M11760</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There are many h.264 encoders out there like x264, mainconcept, intel. As I know, these software implementations are not realtime when compressing HD video (1080i or 720p). This significantly limits the usage of H264 compared with MPEG2. The intel one multi-threads the tasks among slices per frame. One frame has to be encoded before starting a new one. This is not efficient if a frame has less number of slices than the processors. I think there must be some new threading strategies to exploit the concurrency across frames. Any ideas?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shyaki</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-17T19:59:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893130#M11760</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are many h.264 encoders out there like x264, mainconcept, intel. As I know, these software implementations are not realtime when compressing HD video (1080i or 720p). This significantly limits the usage of H264 compared with MPEG2. The intel one multi-threads the tasks among slices per frame. One frame has to be encoded before starting a new one. This is not efficient if a frame has less number of slices than the processors. I think there must be some new threading strategies to exploit the concurrency across frames. Any ideas?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:59:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893130#M11760</guid>
      <dc:creator>shyaki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-17T19:59:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893131#M11761</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;of course different threading approaches are possible. We just implemented one in IPP sample. I think you might also be interested to take a look at Intel Media SDK product which is intended to achieve the best performance by utilizing both software and hardware capabilities of Intel platforms.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893131#M11761</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T07:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893132#M11762</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336498"&gt;Vladimir Dudnik (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;of course different threading approaches are possible. We just implemented one in IPP sample. I think you might also be interested to take a look at Intel Media SDK product which is intended to achieve the best performance by utilizing both software and hardware capabilities of Intel platforms.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;I did a little reading about the Intel Media SDK, and while it does sounds very interesting, it requires at least Vista, is that correct?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:46:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893132#M11762</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T10:46:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893133#M11763</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
Yes, I think it is correct.As time is going, we need to look at future, isn't it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893133#M11763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T17:19:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: H.264 multi-threaded encoding performance</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893134#M11764</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="margin-top: 5px; width: 100%;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/336498"&gt;Vladimir Dudnik (Intel)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Yes, I think it is correct.As time is going, we need to look at future, isn't it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Vladimir&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;Agreed (mostly). I just didn't want shyaki to start getting excited about the SDK (like I did) only to discover that it is Vista only. As for looking forward, I am hoping that Windows 7 overcomes some of the Vista problems that has caused IT departments all over to block its installation on corporate PCs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/H-264-multi-threaded-encoding-performance/m-p/893134#M11764</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvonkaenel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-18T17:37:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

