<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ippStaticInit linked into driver? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippStaticInit-linked-into-driver/m-p/894520#M11907</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;documentation is a bit outdated in that particular case. It was limitation for earlier versions of IPP, starting from version IPP 5.x you cancall IPP static dispatcher in kernel mode drivers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-03T13:40:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ippStaticInit linked into driver?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippStaticInit-linked-into-driver/m-p/894519#M11906</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;I have not found any ill effects to calling ippStaticInit() in code that gets compiled into a driver for XP. However, I do see in the documentation that "The function ippStaticInit should not be used in the driver implementation."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. "THE" driver implementation? Should I read this as, "don't call this function within driver code?"&lt;BR /&gt;2. If so, does anyone know why this is? As I said, I've done it and not seen any problems after extensive testing, but I'd like to know more about why this statement was listed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippStaticInit-linked-into-driver/m-p/894519#M11906</guid>
      <dc:creator>unpocoloco1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-29T16:41:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ippStaticInit linked into driver?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippStaticInit-linked-into-driver/m-p/894520#M11907</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;documentation is a bit outdated in that particular case. It was limitation for earlier versions of IPP, starting from version IPP 5.x you cancall IPP static dispatcher in kernel mode drivers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:40:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/ippStaticInit-linked-into-driver/m-p/894520#M11907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-03T13:40:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

