<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: When ipp_zlib problem will fix? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/When-ipp-zlib-problem-will-fix/m-p/896096#M12132</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I recommend you to take new version of that sample from IPP 5.2 beta. Now it was implemented as a "patch" to original zlib library, so it should provide better compatbility.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-12-04T05:59:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>When ipp_zlib problem will fix?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/When-ipp-zlib-problem-will-fix/m-p/896095#M12131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I see the thread (30224954).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The problems happen to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When will fix the problem?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, I want know why compression ratio is different with zlib.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ipp_zlib compress time was faster than zlib's time. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But, compress ratio was poor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example, I compressed the text file with 5,451,280 bytes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;zlib's result was 2,288,925 bytes, and ipp_zlib's result was 2.910.723.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why compression ratio was different in spite of compression level was same?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;deflate compressing method wasn't standards?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Finally, I could build binary (exe) file with static link.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But I couldn't build static lib file as same. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, I made static library project file with visual studio .net 2003.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And then add ipp_zlib.h and ipp_zlib.c.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And I add ippcorel.lib, ipp*merged.lib files and ipp_px.h into the project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case, I couldn't build the my own ipp_zlib.lib static library.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It wasnever finish the compile.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How I can build the just static library.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:30:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/When-ipp-zlib-problem-will-fix/m-p/896095#M12131</guid>
      <dc:creator>ships</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-29T15:30:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When ipp_zlib problem will fix?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/When-ipp-zlib-problem-will-fix/m-p/896096#M12132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I recommend you to take new version of that sample from IPP 5.2 beta. Now it was implemented as a "patch" to original zlib library, so it should provide better compatbility.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 05:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/When-ipp-zlib-problem-will-fix/m-p/896096#M12132</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-12-04T05:59:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

