<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why is Intel IPP so fast ( Encoding time, decoding time ) in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-is-Intel-IPP-so-fast-Encoding-time-decoding-time/m-p/897163#M12322</link>
    <description>I gave the same parameters in JM and intel ipp ( same input sequence, bit rate, quantisation etc) and intel ipp beats JM in all the parameters i measured ( mse, psnr, and ssim).
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when &lt;BR /&gt;a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Suchethan&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suchethanswaroop</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-30T17:42:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why is Intel IPP so fast ( Encoding time, decoding time )</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-is-Intel-IPP-so-fast-Encoding-time-decoding-time/m-p/897163#M12322</link>
      <description>I gave the same parameters in JM and intel ipp ( same input sequence, bit rate, quantisation etc) and intel ipp beats JM in all the parameters i measured ( mse, psnr, and ssim).
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when &lt;BR /&gt;a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Suchethan&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-is-Intel-IPP-so-fast-Encoding-time-decoding-time/m-p/897163#M12322</guid>
      <dc:creator>suchethanswaroop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-30T17:42:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why is Intel IPP so fast ( Encoding time, decoding time )</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-is-Intel-IPP-so-fast-Encoding-time-decoding-time/m-p/897164#M12323</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV style="margin:0px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="quote_reply" style="width: 100%; margin-top: 5px;"&gt;
&lt;DIV style="margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;Quoting - &lt;A href="https://community.intel.com/en-us/profile/442704"&gt;suchethanswaroop&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Can someone please reply to this thread... I am waiting for a loong time for the answer.. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Regards,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Suchethan&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="background-color:#E5E5E5; padding:5px;border: 1px; border-style: inset;margin-left:2px;margin-right:2px;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I gave the same parameters in JM and intel ipp ( same input sequence, bit rate, quantisation etc) and intel ipp beats JM in all the parameters i measured ( mse, psnr, and ssim).
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when &lt;BR /&gt;a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Suchethan&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Why-is-Intel-IPP-so-fast-Encoding-time-decoding-time/m-p/897164#M12323</guid>
      <dc:creator>suchethanswaroop</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-02T16:37:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

