<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel Performance Primitives and uClibc in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900136#M12622</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;I have an embedded app with very little space that would like to use the IPP. The problem is we don't have room for the GNU C Library and are using uClibc. IPP is supplied in binary form and linked against glibc so it isn't compatible with our target.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;We are tied to a Pentium-M processor so multiple CPU support at runtime is not an issue.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;The documentation talks about a static version of the libraries but our evaluation does not have those static library files present. I have read some information from uClibc people who have had varying levels of success with IPP and uClibc by using the static version.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;Is there any way to receive a version of IPP that is compiled and linked against uclibc?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>postaquestion</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T15:23:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel Performance Primitives and uClibc</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900136#M12622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;I have an embedded app with very little space that would like to use the IPP. The problem is we don't have room for the GNU C Library and are using uClibc. IPP is supplied in binary form and linked against glibc so it isn't compatible with our target.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;We are tied to a Pentium-M processor so multiple CPU support at runtime is not an issue.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;The documentation talks about a static version of the libraries but our evaluation does not have those static library files present. I have read some information from uClibc people who have had varying levels of success with IPP and uClibc by using the static version.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial" size="2"&gt;Is there any way to receive a version of IPP that is compiled and linked against uclibc?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900136#M12622</guid>
      <dc:creator>postaquestion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-22T15:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel Performance Primitives and uClibc</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900137#M12623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Customer,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the late response. We are checking this issue and get back to you soon.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ying &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 00:25:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900137#M12623</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ying_S_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-05T00:25:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>We are having a similar</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900138#M12624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are having a similar situation. Even though this thread is quite old we are looking for a solution link for this. Appreciate any light.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900138#M12624</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesan_G_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-16T14:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ganesan, </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900139#M12625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ganesan,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Did you have a chance to check with the static libraries? &amp;nbsp;Any problem do you get?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
	Chao&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Intel-Performance-Primitives-and-uClibc/m-p/900139#M12625</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-18T06:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

