<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ipp5.1 slower Ipp5.2 in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911018#M14219</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the details, no chance to get sample code to reproduce the issue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-19T09:49:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ipp5.1 slower Ipp5.2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911015#M14216</link>
      <description>Hi !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I development application image processing , i used OpenCV+Ipp5.1 and OpenCV+Ipp5.2 , i don't known why some function of Ipp5.1 fast Ipp5.2 ???&lt;BR /&gt;ex : ippiRotate,IppiPreWitt_Vertz.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911015#M14216</guid>
      <dc:creator>toandvp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-05T08:10:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ipp5.1 slower Ipp5.2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911016#M14217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;could you please provide additional info regarding that issue:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what linkage model do you use, static or dynamic? What is your OS and target processor architecture? Could you please provide us with simple test case to demonstrate that issue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:04:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911016#M14217</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-08T20:04:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ipp5.1 slower Ipp5.2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911017#M14218</link>
      <description>Thanks Vladimir to reply for me !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I use link static. i run on windows XP Pro(32 bit) . i run on core CORE QUARD. i malloc image by ippiMalloc(). i process image GRAY with width=480, and height =480. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; toandvp</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911017#M14218</guid>
      <dc:creator>toandvp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-12T03:50:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ipp5.1 slower Ipp5.2</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911018#M14219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the details, no chance to get sample code to reproduce the issue?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Ipp5-1-slower-Ipp5-2/m-p/911018#M14219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-19T09:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

