<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No ippiMirror_32f? in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912724#M14445</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Koen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you are absolutely correct by using ippiMirror_32s for Ipp32f data types. There is no any specific in copying four-bytes elements (does not matter integer of single precision float) so no reason in separate function. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-09-15T03:03:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No ippiMirror_32f?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912723#M14444</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's me again :-) I was trying to use ippiMirror in a substitute function for ippiCopySymmetricBorder. My data is all floats, so I simply tried ippiMirror_32f_C1R. No luck! That function doesn't exist. Why is that?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I solved it by using ippiMirror_32s_C1R. After all, mirroring is mirroring, and 32 bits is 32 bits.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Koen&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912723#M14444</guid>
      <dc:creator>kavermeer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-01T01:03:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No ippiMirror_32f?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912724#M14445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Koen,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you are absolutely correct by using ippiMirror_32s for Ipp32f data types. There is no any specific in copying four-bytes elements (does not matter integer of single precision float) so no reason in separate function. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:03:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912724#M14445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-15T03:03:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No ippiMirror_32f?</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912725#M14446</link>
      <description>Hi Vladimir,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply. I'll continue to use ippiMirror_32s for Ipp32f data types. It is confusing, though, because in other cases, such as ippiCopy, both _32s and _32f versions are available, while I assume them to be the same as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Koen&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/No-ippiMirror-32f/m-p/912725#M14446</guid>
      <dc:creator>kavermeer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-25T16:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

