<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HD Photo in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913128#M14568</link>
    <description>&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Vladimir:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply. According to the HD Photo description on &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/wmphoto.mspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/wmphoto.mspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;HD Photo delivers a lightweight, high performance algorithm with a 
small memory footprint that enables practical, in-device encoding and decoding. 
HD Photo delivers image quality that is comparable to JPEG-2000 and more than 
twice the quality of JPEG.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Microsoft has submitted HD Photo to the JPEG committee under the name "JPEG XR". Please see &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-31JPEGXRPR.mspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-31JPEGXRPR.mspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently using JPEG compression based on the IPP Library, but the two factors above make HD Photo an attractive alternative. However, I have not been able to find a very efficient SIMD optimized codec for HD Photo. That is why I think HD Photo would be a nice complement to the IPP Library.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John Ens&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John_E_3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-03T15:21:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HD Photo</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913126#M14566</link>
      <description>Are there any plans to add an HD Photo (previous known as Windows Media Photo) codec to IPP?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:18:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913126#M14566</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_E_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-14T17:18:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HD Photo</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913127#M14567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we do not have a firm plan for developing HD Photo functionality yet, it depends on many different factors. Do you see any advantages for that new technology in comparison with JPEG/JPEG2000 whichare an international standards?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913127#M14567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-28T19:39:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HD Photo</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913128#M14568</link>
      <description>&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Vladimir:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your reply. According to the HD Photo description on &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/wmphoto.mspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/wmphoto.mspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;HD Photo delivers a lightweight, high performance algorithm with a 
small memory footprint that enables practical, in-device encoding and decoding. 
HD Photo delivers image quality that is comparable to JPEG-2000 and more than 
twice the quality of JPEG.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Microsoft has submitted HD Photo to the JPEG committee under the name "JPEG XR". Please see &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-31JPEGXRPR.mspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-31JPEGXRPR.mspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently using JPEG compression based on the IPP Library, but the two factors above make HD Photo an attractive alternative. However, I have not been able to find a very efficient SIMD optimized codec for HD Photo. That is why I think HD Photo would be a nice complement to the IPP Library.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John Ens&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913128#M14568</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_E_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-03T15:21:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HD Photo</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913129#M14569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi John,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes, we also saw that features declared for HDPhoto. There is no a firm plan to implement it in IPP yet, but you can submit your feature request to &lt;A href="http://premier.intel.com"&gt;Intel Premier Support&lt;/A&gt;, so it will be revised at the next version planning stage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 19:52:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/HD-Photo/m-p/913129#M14569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-08T19:52:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

