<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Jpeg2000 sample in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Jpeg2000-sample/m-p/914859#M14930</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we tried compression ratio up to 1:200. Of course with such a big compression there is visual artifacts but pucture still be recognizable. In general, it is known that JPEG2000 provides much better compression ration than JPEG. You can check this by yourself, just take IPP JPEG2000 sample and try it with parameters you like. Do we need any help with that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-02T16:50:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Jpeg2000 sample</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Jpeg2000-sample/m-p/914858#M14929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt; i would like to check if the jpeg2000 sample my compression ratio is 40 and above, is the colour degradation very bad ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Jpeg2000-sample/m-p/914858#M14929</guid>
      <dc:creator>zijia15</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-02T11:48:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jpeg2000 sample</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Jpeg2000-sample/m-p/914859#M14930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we tried compression ratio up to 1:200. Of course with such a big compression there is visual artifacts but pucture still be recognizable. In general, it is known that JPEG2000 provides much better compression ration than JPEG. You can check this by yourself, just take IPP JPEG2000 sample and try it with parameters you like. Do we need any help with that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimr&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:50:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Jpeg2000-sample/m-p/914859#M14930</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-02T16:50:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

