<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance of JPEG2000 encoding/decoding in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915244#M14988</link>
    <description>What is expected performance of JPEG2000 encoding and decoding ? I get only about 4-5 fps/core when encoding 704x576 images on Pentium4 3GHz (EM64T). Is there any chance that it can/will be improved ? I need a few times more ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Kamil&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maciej_K_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-07-26T09:55:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance of JPEG2000 encoding/decoding</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915244#M14988</link>
      <description>What is expected performance of JPEG2000 encoding and decoding ? I get only about 4-5 fps/core when encoding 704x576 images on Pentium4 3GHz (EM64T). Is there any chance that it can/will be improved ? I need a few times more ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;Kamil&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915244#M14988</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maciej_K_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T09:55:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance of JPEG2000 encoding/decoding</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915245#M14989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Kamil,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;basically, JPEG2000 algorithm is more complicated than previous JPEG, so it require significantly more calculation power from the system. I would recommend you to use the latest Intel processors like Core2Duo with two or even better four cores as we have threaded JPEG2000 in entropy coding stage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From our side, we plan add parallelization towavelet transform stage in IPP JPEG2000 sample in future versions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt; Vladimir&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:05:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915245#M14989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vladimir_Dudnik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T10:05:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance of JPEG2000 encoding/decoding</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915246#M14990</link>
      <description>Thanks for the quick answer ! Actually parallelization makes no difference for me, because I'm running a few decoders in different threads - I thought that I was doing some mistake by using some bad options etc. I don't know much about JPEG2000 and I've not expected it to be so complicated and cpu hungry ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kamil</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Performance-of-JPEG2000-encoding-decoding/m-p/915246#M14990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maciej_K_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-07-26T14:37:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

