<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Deinterlace Functions in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Deinterlace-Functions/m-p/918002#M15340</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I'm currently using&amp;nbsp;DeinterlaceFilterCAVT for deinterlacing. &amp;nbsp;However, it seems this is now deprecated in 7.1. &amp;nbsp;Is this method typically not used over others? &amp;nbsp;I've moved to triangle for now, but was curious as to why it's being deprecated, and if anyone has suggestions for a better method to use in place of CAVT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Nimesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nimesh_A_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-18T06:51:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deinterlace Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Deinterlace-Functions/m-p/918002#M15340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I'm currently using&amp;nbsp;DeinterlaceFilterCAVT for deinterlacing. &amp;nbsp;However, it seems this is now deprecated in 7.1. &amp;nbsp;Is this method typically not used over others? &amp;nbsp;I've moved to triangle for now, but was curious as to why it's being deprecated, and if anyone has suggestions for a better method to use in place of CAVT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Nimesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 06:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Deinterlace-Functions/m-p/918002#M15340</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nimesh_A_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-18T06:51:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Many of the deprecations were</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Deinterlace-Functions/m-p/918003#M15341</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Many of the deprecations were based on usage data.&amp;nbsp; Functions with very low reported usage were marked as deprecated.&amp;nbsp; However, this does not automatically mean they will be removed.&amp;nbsp; Your response will be considered as part of the evaluation process that will happen before removals, which are still far off.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Deprecated functions will remain in IPP through at least 1 more major release, so for now you may continue to use DeinterlaceFilterCAVT if that meets your needs best.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You've probably already seen the following page, but this is where we'll put updates on deprecation info: &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/ipp-deprecated-features-feedback/index.php"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/ipp-deprecated-features-feedback/index.php&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/Deinterlace-Functions/m-p/918003#M15341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeffrey_M_Intel1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-18T23:47:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

