<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hello,  in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-and-zlib/m-p/919974#M15549</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback, &amp;nbsp;Some more performance data we had test here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/collateral/XE/Intel-IPP7-0_Brief_101011-2.pdf"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/collateral/XE/Intel-IPP7-0_Brief_101011-2.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The performance you tested looks fine. &amp;nbsp;I am also tracking the request on new v1.2.7 support.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T06:51:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPP and zlib</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-and-zlib/m-p/919973#M15548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. In IPP Samples 7.1 you have the zlib source adapted for IPP. I took that source and compiled it instead of the usual native v1.2.7 source. It reduced decompression time 20% to 50%. Is that what is expcetd? To me it was a little disapointing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Your code is based on version 1.2.5. It is pretty old by now. When will it be updated?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. In gzread and gzwrite and I had to&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#if defined(WIN32)&lt;BR /&gt;#include &amp;lt;windows.h&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#include &amp;lt;tchar.h&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#endif&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You use DWORD with declaring anywhere for instance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 05:07:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-and-zlib/m-p/919973#M15548</guid>
      <dc:creator>erling_andersen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T05:07:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hello, </title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-and-zlib/m-p/919974#M15549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback, &amp;nbsp;Some more performance data we had test here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/sites/products/collateral/XE/Intel-IPP7-0_Brief_101011-2.pdf"&gt;http://software.intel.com/sites/products/collateral/XE/Intel-IPP7-0_Brief_101011-2.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The performance you tested looks fine. &amp;nbsp;I am also tracking the request on new v1.2.7 support.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Chao&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/IPP-and-zlib/m-p/919974#M15549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chao_Y_Intel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T06:51:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

