<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I found link http://software in Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives</title>
    <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/using-ippsDFTInit-C-with-using-ippsFFTInit/m-p/922817#M15896</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I found link &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-use-intel-ipp-s-1d-fourier-transform-functions" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-use-intel-ipp-s-1d-fourier-transform-functions&lt;/A&gt; that answer on my first question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the second question remains relevant. Why interface for DFT and FFT initialization functions is different? It is only confuse. May be it can be changed in next versions of IPP?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Itzhak&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Itzhak_B_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-10T06:34:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using ippsDFTInit_C with using ippsFFTInit</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/using-ippsDFTInit-C-with-using-ippsFFTInit/m-p/922816#M15895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;it is confusing the difference between DFTInit and FFTInit&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;{&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; int *sizeSpec, *sizeInit, *sizeBuff;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IppDFTSpec_C_64fc *pSpecDfr, *pSpecFft;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ipp8u *pSpecFft, *pInit, *pBuff;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#ifdef USE_DFT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ippsDFTGetSize_C_64fc(16, IPP_FFT_NODIV_BY_ANY, ippAlgHintNone, &amp;amp;sizeSpec, &amp;amp;sizeInit, &amp;amp;sizeBuff);&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#else&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ippsFFTGetSize_C_64fc(4, IPP_FFT_NODIV_BY_ANY, ippAlgHintNone, &amp;amp;sizeSpec, &amp;amp;sizeInit, &amp;amp;sizeBuff);&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#endif&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; pSpec = ippsMalloc_8u(sizeSpec); pInit = ippsMalloc_8u(sizeInit); pBuff = ippsMalloc_8u(sizeBuff);&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#ifdef USE_DFT&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ippsDFTInit_C_64fc(10, IPP_FFT_NODIV_BY_ANY, ippAlgHintNone, pSpec , pInit );&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#else&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ippsFFTInit_C_64fc(&amp;amp;pSpecFft, 4, IPP_FFT_NODIV_BY_ANY, ippAlgHintNone, pSpec, pInit ); // here we provide additional argument&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;#endif&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; // using fft or dft converting functions&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;}&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did I making right the initialization for FFt and DFT?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why the interface is different for DFT and FFT? I mean why for FFT I need to provide additional argument for Init function? Why it can be done in the same way for DFT and FFT? It is confusing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/using-ippsDFTInit-C-with-using-ippsFFTInit/m-p/922816#M15895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Itzhak_B_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-09T07:59:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I found link http://software</title>
      <link>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/using-ippsDFTInit-C-with-using-ippsFFTInit/m-p/922817#M15896</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I found link &lt;A href="http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-use-intel-ipp-s-1d-fourier-transform-functions" target="_blank"&gt;http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/how-to-use-intel-ipp-s-1d-fourier-transform-functions&lt;/A&gt; that answer on my first question.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the second question remains relevant. Why interface for DFT and FFT initialization functions is different? It is only confuse. May be it can be changed in next versions of IPP?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Itzhak&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Integrated-Performance/using-ippsDFTInit-C-with-using-ippsFFTInit/m-p/922817#M15896</guid>
      <dc:creator>Itzhak_B_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-10T06:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

